Скачать или смотреть How to Use np.where in Python to Get Single Indexes in a Loop

Learn how to effectively use `np.where` in Python to return only the current index during a loop, particularly when working with chessboard-like nested arrays.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62986555/ asked by the user 'Martin Chapman' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13861509/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62986949/ provided by the user 'hpaulj' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/901925/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How do I get np.where to return only the spot the for loop is on? (Python)

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Solving the np.where Dilemma in Python

Have you ever faced the frustration of getting multiple values when you only need a single value in Python? If you're working with arrays, particularly in a task like navigating a chessboard with numpy, you might have encountered this issue with np.where. In this post, we'll explore how to solve this problem effectively.

The Problem at Hand

Imagine you have a virtual chessboard represented as a nested array (or matrix) and you want to check each cell to see if it's empty, represented as 0. You're using np.where to find the indexes of these empty cells, but when there are multiple empty cells, np.where returns arrays containing multiple indices. This leads to the following error:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This occurs because when you execute a conditional statement using an array with multiple values, Python cannot interpret this ambiguity.

Understanding the Solution

Let's break down the solution to ensure that np.where returns only the index of the current spot we are focused on.

Step 1: Use np.argwhere

Instead of using np.where, you can utilize np.argwhere which is designed for this purpose. This function returns the indices of all positions where the condition is satisfied, formatted in a way that's easier to manipulate.

Here's how you can implement it:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Handling Multiple Indices

When working with the results from np.argwhere, it's essential to check how many results you get back:

If you only need a single index, you can slice the resulting array from np.argwhere directly.

To prevent getting an ambiguous value, make sure to handle this safely.

Here’s a quick implementation that checks and iterates over empty spots:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 3: Final Touches

Make sure to update your chessboard appropriately after navigating through it, just as you have with your original logic.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

By switching to np.argwhere, you can manage your searches for empty spaces on a chessboard without running into ambiguous errors. Handling multiple indices carefully allows for safer and more effective loop executions.

Next time you grapple with an np.where issue, remember this method, and you'll be navigating through your nested arrays like a chess master!