Reviewing three New Testament TEXTUAL VARIANTS with Dr. David Alan Black.

In this second Part, Dr. David Alan Black and I review the evidence for 3 New Testament textual variant reading from a Sturzian perspective: Ephesians 1:1 in Ephesus, John 3:13 Who is in heaven and Matthew 5:22 angry without a cause. From the perspective of one who puts more authority behind the Byzantine text, Dr. Black shares his reasoning on why these passages should be included.

#TextualCriticism #ByzantinText #DavidAlanBlack


~~~ RESOURCES ~~~

The Byzantine Text-Type & New Testament Textual Criticism:
https://www.amazon.com/Byzantine-Text...

Can We Recover the Original Text of the New Testament?
https://www.amazon.com/Can-Recover-Or...

~~~ CONTENTS ~~~

0:00 Introduction 3 examples of Sturzian approach to TC.
1:18 Example 1 - in Ephesus eph 1.1
3:25 The letters weren't written to us initially
4:18 Ephesians has no personal readings
5:18 Its a nonsense reading if you remove it!
7:28 If it's not scripture why put it in the main text?
8:30 Is Dr Black a continuationist? and Mark 16
9:23 The great commission from Mark instead of Matthew
11:39 The Johannine Comma and my last video
12:12 Examples 2 - Who is in heaven John 3.13
14:07 John 3.13 continued
15:05 The debate on Christology in Alexandria in the first 4 centuries
17:36 Example 3 - Angry WITHOUT A CAUSE Matthew 5:22
18:44 The internal evidence
20:32 Matthew tends to have more nuanced teachings.
21:48 Be angry if you can avoid 3 things.
22:37 Does this impact how you would teach on anger?
23:40 Giving weight to assumptions in textual criticism.