Скачать или смотреть Resolving Multi-threading Issues in Python for Web Scraping: How to Process Full Lists Efficiently

Discover how to fix common multi-threading issues in Python that hinder web scraping processes and learn to optimize your code for better results.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/66853932/ asked by the user 'Abhishek Rai' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12319746/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/66854813/ provided by the user 'AKX' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/51685/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Multi threading not processing full list

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Resolving Multi-threading Issues in Python for Web Scraping: How to Process Full Lists Efficiently

Web scraping can be an incredibly powerful tool, allowing you to extract data from various web sources to analyze or utilize. However, when working with large datasets such as URLs, using multi-threading can present its own challenges. One common problem that many developers encounter is when their code does not process full lists of URLs, stopping arbitrarily before completion.

In this guide, we will explore this multi-threading issue and provide a clear, step-by-step solution to help you maximize your web scraping efforts.

Understanding the Problem

When employing multi-threading, you might encounter a situation where your script stops processing URLs prematurely. For example, if you have a list containing 5000 URLs, your code might only work through 4084 of them. This issue can occur regardless of whether you're utilizing max-workers or even running the operation without multi-threading, meaning that a larger problem could be at play.

Common signs of this issue include:

Incomplete execution of the URL list.

Inconsistent stopping points across different runs.

Frequent errors or exceptions being raised by certain URL requests.

Analyzing the Code

Let’s take a look at an example code snippet that highlights this issue. The code utilizes multi-threading with a ThreadPoolExecutor to extract data from a collection of URLs, processing results and writing them to a CSV file.

However, this code may be flawed due to how it handles concurrency and file writing, particularly with the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL) in Python that can slow down thread-based implementations. Here’s a quick review of the original problematic code snippet:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This structure might lead to incomplete processing because multiple threads try to write to the CSV at the same time, resulting in race conditions and mismanaged outputs.

Providing a Solution

Transition from Thread-based to Process-based Approach

To resolve these issues, consider transitioning from a thread-based approach to a process-based approach. This change leverages the multiprocessing module instead of concurrent.futures, effectively circumventing GIL limitations.

Here’s how you can revise your code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Key Changes in the Solution

Process Pool: The use of multiprocessing.Pool() allows multiple processes to operate simultaneously, evading GIL constraints that affect thread execution.

Persistent Session: The requests session is reused for all URL requests, significantly improving performance by reusing sockets.

Error Handling: Improved error management returns error messages for failed requests instead of halting execution, ensuring all URLs are processed.

Conclusion

Switching from a thread-based approach to a process-based methodology can dramatically enhance your web scraping capabilities. It ensures you can work through complete lists of URLs without unexpected interruptions. By following the solutions provided above, you can increase the efficiency and reliability of your scraping scripts, allowing you to extract the data you need seamlessly.

Final Thoughts

Implementing effective multi-threading or multi-processing strategies in Python web scraping requires clear understanding and optimized coding practices. By adjusting your approach to concurrency, you can resolve processing issues and elevate your web scraping projects to new heights.