Does NMN Supplementation actually work? [Study 203 - 215 Analysis]

JOIN THE PHYSIONIC INSIDERS [PREMIUM CONTENT]
Join the Physionic Insiders: https://bit.ly/PhysionicInsiders2

HEALTH AUTONOMY [COURSE]
Learn to Analyze & Apply Studies for Yourself: https://bit.ly/healthautonomy

JOIN THE COMMUNITY
Join my Community [It’s Free!]: https://bit.ly/PhysionicCommunity2

EMAIL LIST
1-2 Weekly Email of Value [It’s Free!]: http://bit.ly/2AXIzK6

HIRE ME FOR CONSULTING:
Consulting: https://bit.ly/3dmUl2H


Created with Biorender

Studies, Notes, & Amendments: https://bit.ly/PhysionicNMN

0:00 – What you can Expect
1:25 – Topics Covered
3:03 – Mechanisms of NMN on NAD+
4:45 – Mechanisms of NAD+ on Health
17:01 – NMN Supplementation: Does it Work?
17:23 – Study 203: Single Dose Effects
22:56 – Study 204: NMN for Women, Pre-Diabetes
28:03 – Mechanisms of Insulin Sensitivity
35:41 – Mechanisms of mTOR Activity
42:50 – Study 207: Middle Aged, Healthy People
52:48 – Study 208:Middle Aged, Healthy People
1:02:36 – Study 209: Young, Healthy People
1:07:01 – Side Effects of NMN
1:07:50 - Study 210: Middle Aged, Overweight People
1:16:25 – Study 211: Older, Healthy People
1:25:50 – Study 212: Older, Diabetic People
1:30:05 – Study 213: Women Dominant, Middle Aged, Healthy People
1:37:40 – Study 214
1:40:05 – Study 215: Dr. David Sinclair’s Study (Older, Overweight People)
1:47:45 – My Major issues with Study 215 (Dr. Sinclair’s Study)
1:52:50 – Mid-Point Conclusions/Take Aways

*******CRITIQUES, RULES, AND NOTES*******

Be aware of the following rules before posting comments:
Please do not post summaries of the video in the comments - it damages retention on the video and YouTube is less likely to promote it (these videos cost me a lot of money to produce). Your comment will be deleted, and if it persists, you will be banned.

Critiques of my work are welcome! Please be aware of the following notes & rules before submitting critique:

The information provided in this study analysis is limited to the subject and outcomes detailed in the study analyzed [For example: “Consuming sugar (subject) raises insulin (outcome).”] and is not meant to be an all-encompassing education on every health outcome of the subject (unless otherwise stated). I welcome all respectful critique of the study as I may have missed a key detail that you may catch; if that is the case, I will make an ‘Amendment’ to the video and credit you (thank you for making science knowledge better!). Also be aware that I receive hundreds of YouTube comments per day, so the only way your critique can be considered is if you follow the steps outlined below. Finally, YouTube auto-deletes links, so I do not see most comments with links attached.

RULES:
If your comment is rude, you will be banned without warning.
If your comment is not about the studies/topics at hand (i.e. extending to other outcomes not discussed) or offers critique with no scientific basis, your comment will be ignored.

If you can follow these rules, I will try to address your critique and if there is merit, I will add an AMENDMENT to the content in question and pin it so everyone can see it.

Please use the following link to submit your critique: https://bit.ly/PhysionicCritique

Disclaimer: None of the information provided by this brand is a replacement for your physician's advice. This brand is information for the sake of knowledge and the options of choice it provides, not in any way a personalized prescription. Please consult your physician before making any health related changes.

#nmn #antiaging #longevity