Скачать или смотреть Disha says difference of opinion not sedition, judge questions police - The Indian ExpressRFN

Additional Sessions Judge Dharmender Rana questioned the Delhi Police on whether it had any evidence against Ravi or “are we required to draw inferences and conjectures”.
With Additional Solicitor General SV Raju and Additional Public Prosecutor Irfan Ahmad, who appeared for Delhi Police, opposing the bail application, Ravi’s lawyer Siddharth Agarwal told the court that “having a difference of opinion does not amount to sedition”, that his client sought Thunberg’s support for issues being raised by farmers, and “she did not tweet for Khalistan”.
Detailing the prosecution’s case, Raju told the court that Poetic Justice Foundation (PJF) founders Mo Dhaliwal and Anita Lal who are “Khalistani sympathisers, wanted to take advantage of the farmer agitation to carry out its activities.
He said co-accused Nikita Jacob and Shantanu Muluk attended a Zoom meeting on January 11 with “60-70 people across the globe” including Dhaliwal and Lal.
On Thursday, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, responding to a query from ABP News on Ravi’s arrest, defended the Delhi Police action, saying while he did not wish to speak on the merits of the case or the investigation since “IPS officers and police will do their job in a professional manner”, but “I want to ask one thing that if someone commits a crime, should one ask the person’s age, profession, association… what is this new method?”.