Скачать или смотреть Sizing Parameters in Verilog - A Guide to Assignment Resets

Learn how to handle parameter sizing in Verilog effectively to avoid synthesis tool warnings when assigning reset values.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/75250075/ asked by the user 'Fischreiher' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4934300/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/75250314/ provided by the user 'Mikef' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/899862/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Sizing a parameter value in an assignment of a reset value

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Sizing Parameters in Verilog - A Guide to Assignment Resets

When working with hardware description languages like Verilog and SystemVerilog, developers often face challenges related to parameter values, particularly when assigning reset values to registers. One common issue arises when trying to assign a reset value that does not match the width of the target register, leading to warnings from synthesis tools. In this guide, we'll explore the problem of sizing parameter values and provide a clear, organized solution to ensure your code compiles without warnings.

Understanding the Problem

In the given scenario, a RESET_VAL parameter is defined but does not match the width of the corresponding register. For instance, the following example shows a RESET_VAL of 5, which may default to a 32-bit representation, while the register data is defined with a width of WIDTH (let's say 6 bits). The synthesis tool then throws a warning:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Key Question

How can we specify parameter sizes correctly without needing to modify every single submodule?

The Solution

1. Define the Parameter with Correct Sizing

To resolve the width mismatch, you can redefine the parameter RESET_VAL with an explicit size. Instead of using an unsized literal, you can define it as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Here's a complete example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This produces the output:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

By specifying 6'd5, you've ensured that the parameter is treated as a 6-bit value, thus avoiding width mismatches when it’s assigned to the register.

2. Alternate Solution for 32-bit Parameters

If your design requires the parameter to remain 32 bits but you want to eliminate the warning during assignment, you can consider the following approach:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, WIDTH can be passed from the top module, allowing flexibility across different modules without hardcoding the size across each individual segment of your code.

Conclusion

Correctly sizing parameters in Verilog is essential for avoiding synthesis warnings and ensuring your code is robust and maintainable. By explicitly defining parameter sizes or slicing them appropriately, you can eliminate width mismatches during assignments. This approach not only simplifies parameter management across module hierarchies, but it also enhances the overall readability of your code.

So the next time you encounter warnings related to parameter values, remember these solutions to enhance the robustness and clarity of your Verilog designs.