Скачать или смотреть Avoiding ValueError in fsolve from scipy.optimize

Learn how to handle `ValueError` in `fsolve` by utilizing try/except constructs or alternatives for NaN values in your equations using SciPy.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62480647/ asked by the user 'guiprado' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13730840/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62484296/ provided by the user 'alec_djinn' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3190076/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Avoiding value Error into fsolve from scipy.optimize

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Avoiding ValueError in fsolve from scipy.optimize: A Comprehensive Guide

When working with numerical computations in Python, particularly when using the SciPy library, you might encounter a common issue: the dreaded ValueError. This error often arises when dealing with invalid inputs in functions, especially when calling external libraries like CoolProp. In this post, we will explore how to avoid these errors while using the fsolve function to solve a block of equations.

Understanding the Problem

The fsolve function is great for solving systems of nonlinear equations, but it can face issues if any of the inputs lead to undefined values. In your scenario, you're using a function that relies on external calls which may not always return valid numbers. This can lead to cases where fsolve throws a ValueError, like the one shown below:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This error suggests that your computations produced a NaN (Not a Number), rendering the output invalid for the respective function you are evaluating.

Strategies to Avoid ValueError

To handle cases where ValueError might occur, you can adopt one of the following strategies.

Strategy 1: Using Try/Except Blocks

This method involves wrapping your function call with a try/catch block. If a ValueError occurs, you can choose to skip the iteration or catch the error gracefully.

Example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Strategy 2: Handling NaN Values

Another effective approach is to handle NaN inputs directly in your function. You can replace NaN values with zeros or any default value that suits your application.

Example:

Here's a simple way to redefine your computation function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

A Toy Example for Context

To illustrate how you can handle NaN values, here's a simplified example using a custom function that might receive NaN inputs:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Output:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

Handling errors like ValueError when using fsolve in SciPy is crucial for the robustness of your code. By wrapping your function calls using try/except blocks or by checking for NaN inputs, you can ensure that your equations are solved without interruptions. Choose the strategy that best fits your application context and requirements.

These practices will not only help you debug your code but will also improve its reliability and readability. Happy coding!