"SARMs vs. Steroids: Muscle Gains, Risks, and Which Is Better?"
Disclaimer: This video is for educational purposes only. SARMs and anabolic steroids are not FDA-approved for recreational use, carry serious health risks, and are illegal in many countries. Always consult a healthcare professional before considering any performance-enhancing substances. Natural training, diet, and recovery are the safest paths to gains.
Hey fitness fam! In this eye-opening video, we dive deep into the world of SARMs (Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators) vs. anabolic steroids—two powerhouse compounds hyped for muscle growth, strength, and body transformation. But are SARMs the "safer" steroid alternative, or is it all hype? We break it all down with science-backed facts, comparisons, pros, cons, side effects, dosages, and real talk on risks vs. rewards. Whether you're a bodybuilder, athlete, or just curious about PEDs, this is your ultimate guide.
What We Cover:
The Science Behind SARMs & Steroids: How SARMs selectively bind to androgen receptors in muscle and bone for anabolic effects (like 1-3 kg lean mass gains in trials), while steroids hit receptors body-wide. We explain anabolic-to-androgenic ratios (SARMs: 3:1 to 90:1 vs. steroids' 1:1 baseline
) and why selectivity matters.
SARMs Uncovered: From Ostarine (MK-2866) to RAD140 and Ligandrol—top compounds for bulking, cutting, and recomp. At least 8 SARMs (like YK-11 and S-23) are proven to build muscle in studies, with 2025 research focusing on muscle wasting, bone density, and metabolic health
Steroids Breakdown: Testosterone, Nandrolone, DHT derivatives (e.g., Winstrol, Anavar), and Trenbolone. Massive gains (5-10 kg in cycles) but at what cost?
Head-to-Head Comparison:
Pros: SARMs offer milder gains with fewer androgenic sides (e.g., less hair loss, prostate issues), oral dosing, and bone benefits. Steroids deliver superior strength and size but require injections.
Cons: SARMs are unregulated (70% mislabeled products), banned by WADA, and illegal for human use. Steroids are controlled substances with severe legal risks.
Dosages & Cycles: SARMs (e.g., Ostarine 10-25 mg/day, 6-12 weeks; RAD140 10-20 mg/day, 6-8 weeks). Steroids (e.g., Testosterone 200-600 mg/week, 8-12 weeks; Trenbolone 100-300 mg/week, 6-8 weeks). Always need PCT!
Side Effects: SARMs: Testosterone suppression, liver strain, HDL drop, headaches (milder than steroids). Steroids: Gynecomastia, heart risks, aggression, dependency—plus 2025 warnings on long-term damage
Risk vs. Reward Showdown: Steroids win for raw power (higher anabolic ratings), but SARMs edge out for beginners with lower androgenic risks. Yet both can cause irreversible harm—stick to natural methods for sustainable results (0.5-2 kg muscle/month via training & nutrition)!
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro: SARMs vs. Steroids Hype
0:23 disclaimer
0:26 Science & Mechanisms
1:42 Similarities & Differences
3:13 Pros of SARMs & Steroids
4:16 Cons & Legal Status
5:05 Side Effects Deep Dive
6:04 Dosages & Cycles
8:02 Risk vs. Reward: Which Wins?
9:12 Safe Alternatives
9:47 Outro like and sub
Backed by 2025 studies from The Lancet Oncology, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology, FDA warnings, and more—links below. SARMs show promise for cachexia and osteoporosis, but recreational use? Sketchy and dangerous.
Key Takeaway: Gains aren't worth the gamble. Focus on evidence-based training, nutrition, and recovery. What do you think—SARMs, steroids, or natural? Comment below!
If this helped, smash LIKE, SUBSCRIBE, and hit the bell for more science-based fitness content. Share with a gym bro who needs to hear this!
Sources & Studies (Full List in Video):
Dalton et al. (2011). The Lancet Oncology
Basaria et al. (2018). Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
FDA Warnings (2017-2025) on SARMs risks
Pope et al. (2014). Endocrine Reviews
2025 Updates: NutriMax SARMs Research & FitScience Methodology
#SARMs #Steroids #MuscleGains #FitnessScience #Bodybuilding #PEDs #AnabolicSteroids #Ostarine #RAD140 #Testosterone #GymTips #WorkoutScience
Информация по комментариям в разработке