Скачать или смотреть Daughters Right to Property | Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma Case Analysis 2020

When the Hindu Succession Act was enacted in 1956; the legislators didn’t actually felt any need for giving equal rights to daughters in the coparcenary property of the father, due to their belief that the daughter will be a part of another family after her marriage and thus should not have right to inherit anything from her father’s property.

#vineetasharmavsrakeshsharma #hindusuccessionact #ancestralproperty #familyproperty #shorts #daughtersrighttoproperty #vineetasharmavsrakeshsharma #hinduundividedfamily #legalupdates #legalawareness #supremecourtofindia #daughtersrighttoproperty #daughterrightsinproperty #daughtersrightonfathersproperty #daughterpropertyrightsindia #rightstomarrieddaughters
#womenempowerment #lawstudents #caseanalysis #highcourtjudgment #orrisahighcourt

~In this Video we are going to discuss:
About a landmark judgment that changed the course of women’s inheritance rights in India —
the Vineeta Sharma case — where daughters finally got equal coparcenary rights.”

“For generations, daughters were seen as guests in their own homes.
The property of their fathers — belonged only to sons.
But in 2020, one woman’s courage re-wrote that story.
This is the tale of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma —
the case that declared: a daughter is equal by birth.”

“Under Hindu law, ancestral property is shared by coparceners —
traditionally, only the sons.
Daughters? They were excluded.
Even after the Hindu Succession Act of 1956, inequality remained.
Then in 2005, a historic amendment promised daughters equal rights — but confusion followed.
Did the law apply if the father had already passed away?”

“Vineeta Sharma lost her father in 1999.
Years later, when she asked for her share in the ancestral property,
her brothers refused — claiming she had no right.
The dispute reached the Supreme Court.
The question before the nation was simple —
Does equality depend on the date of a father’s death?”

“On 11 August 2020, a three-judge bench delivered its verdict.
The Court declared:
‘A daughter shall remain a coparcener throughout life,
with the same rights and liabilities as a son.’
It didn’t matter whether the father was alive or not.
The right flows from birth itself.
The Supreme Court overruled earlier cases and cleared all doubts —
justice was finally equal.”

“The Vineeta Sharma judgment changed the destiny of millions.
It wasn’t just a legal ruling — it was a declaration that gender equality begins at home.
Today, daughters across India can stand tall, knowing the law stands with them.

Because a daughter’s right is not a favor — it’s her birthright.”

“Vineeta Sharma’s fight wasn’t just about property — it was about equality.
Every women should take a stand for their own rights like Veenita sharma.

Thank You!