Middlesbrough Security Reaction to filming. And Special Agents too!!

BE WARNED. IF YOU’RE GOING TO COMMENT WITH STUPIDLY TROLLING REMARKS, THEN YOU’RE GOING TO GET WHATEVER SHIT COMES INTO MY MIND FIRST, RIGHT BACK AT YOU.

You don’t have to agree with what I do, you don’t have to like it. But you can block my videos from even appearing in your feed and then you don’t have to watch.

Middlesbrough Security and members of the public have an aversion to being filmed- yet remain on camera.

I was filming outside of this centre and had had no interference from anyone originally, including the two street wardens that are featured, but was aware that the Dundas Street private security had been watching. Turning my camera off, I headed through the centre to my car and was approached by the security who told me that I couldn’t film in there (even though I wasn’t) and that they would stop me, “put me down and smash the fucking thing”.

Obviously I’m then going to start recording, and that would have been the shortest film i’ve made...until they followed me outside.

Apparently everyone in Middlesbrough has protection against being filmed in public, but they obviously want to be on camera.

A half hearted apology to the female that I said I would edit out. I don’t have the software to do it and I’m against editing because she chose to stand there knowing I was filming and then got involved with the video- makes her as fair game and as stupid as the goons trying to assert their
assumed authority.

Previous day...    • Security do not allow filming.  



I’d also like to clear something else up as well.

There is no law that prohibits the taking of photographs on private property (except possibly at some government/military installations) however a land owner does have the right to stop you doing something on their land and have you removed for trespass if you don't comply. However, if that happened the only offence committed would be trespass and not "illegal taking of photos on private property".

Since the security had not declared that the area was private property when I started filming, and there were no signs up forbidding or prohibiting the taking of photographs...I was within the law.

And, considering that a threat had been made. It was in the best interests of all involved.