Скачать или смотреть How to Properly Populate a Pre-Allocated Vector in R: Solutions and Best Practices

Discover how to correctly add elements to a pre-allocated vector in R using simple loops or vectorized methods. Follow our detailed guide for better coding practices!
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64030458/ asked by the user 'Overtime4728' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13995506/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64030603/ provided by the user 'jay.sf' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6574038/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Items not added properly to pre-allocated vector in r

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Introduction

One common issue that R users encounter when working with vectors is the proper way to populate pre-allocated lists or vectors. In this guide, we'll address a specific case where data was not added correctly to a pre-allocated vector and discuss how to resolve the problem.

The Problem

A user encountered a situation where they attempted to add calculated differences from a set to a pre-allocated vector. While the calculated differences for one vector were being populated correctly, the other vector only partially updated. Here’s a brief overview of what the user was trying to achieve with their code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, when performing a similar operation for y, the user faced issues:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this guide, we will provide a solution to this issue and guide you on how to achieve desired results effectively.

Solution to the Issue

Understanding the Problem

In the original code, the user attempted to use the values of y directly as indices in the y_num vector. Since y contains floating-point numbers, this leads to unexpected behavior.

A Better Approach: Using seq_along()

To correctly populate the y_num vector, the user should use the seq_along function, which generates a sequence along the length of y. This way, the loop will iterate over the correct indices. The updated code would look like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of Code Changes

seq_along(y) generates indices (1, 2, ..., length(y)), effectively replacing the issue of using the actual values in y as indices.

The calculations remain the same, but now the results are correctly populated in y_num.

The Vectorized Alternative

While the loop method is good to demonstrate the concepts, R is designed to be highly efficient with vectorized operations. The entire difference calculation can be done in one line. This approach is not only cleaner but also significantly faster for large datasets. Here’s how you can do it:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Advantages of Vectorization

Performance: Vectorized operations are generally faster because R is optimized for handling whole vectors rather than individual elements.

Readability: Cleaner code that is easier to read and maintain.

Conclusion

In this guide, we've discussed a common problem that arises when adding data to pre-allocated vectors in R. By switching to seq_along() for loop iteration or utilizing R's vectorization capabilities, you can streamline your data manipulation tasks effectively.

Hopefully, this guide helps clear up any confusion you may have had and encourages better coding practices in your R programming journey. Happy coding!