Скачать или смотреть Understanding the Range Index Cannot Be a Real Number Error in Verilog

Learn how to solve the common Verilog error related to range definitions by using integer values instead of real numbers for parameterized outputs.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/73915069/ asked by the user 'Explicn't' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/19257397/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/73915116/ provided by the user 'Explicn't' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/19257397/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Verilog "Range Index cannot be a real number" error on range definition

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
A Guide to Solving Verilog's "Range Index Cannot Be a Real Number" Error

When working with hardware description languages like Verilog, encountering errors during coding and simulation is common, especially when it comes to defining ranges for outputs. One such error frequently encountered by users is the "Range Index Cannot Be a Real Number" error. In this post, we will explore the underlying issue related to this specific error and provide you with a clear solution that will help you avoid this pitfall in the future.

The Issue Explained

As you experiment with Verilog, you may find yourself defining the range of an output based on various parameters. In a recent scenario, a user attempted to define an output signal Z using a calculation that incorporated a parameter N. While doing so, they encountered the error message indicating that the range index cannot be a real number. The problematic range definition looked like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The error arose when this output was being passed to another module:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

To add to the confusion, a similar range definition for an input variable X was successfully implemented without errors:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

What Caused the Error?

The crux of the problem lies in the use of the floating-point (real) numbers in calculations that Verilog expects to resolve to integers. It's important to note that Verilog's range definitions must be specified using integer values. When the user introduced the floating-point computations (e.g., (0.5*N*N)), Verilog did not know how to handle this as a valid index.

The Solution

Use Integer Arithmetic

To resolve the issue, we need to modify the calculations to ensure they produce integer values. Here’s how you can adjust the range definition for Z:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this revised version:

The real number calculations have been replaced with integer equivalent expressions, achieving the same result without resulting in an error.

For example, (0.5*N*N) has been replaced with (((N*N)/2) to keep it in the realm of integer arithmetic.

Benefits of the Solution

Eliminates Errors: By ensuring all calculations lead to integers, you can avoid any future range index errors.

Increases Readability: The use of integer operations can sometimes make the code more understandable for those who may read it later.

Conclusion

The "Range Index Cannot Be a Real Number" error is a common hurdle in Verilog that arises from using real numbers in range definitions. By using integer arithmetic instead of floating-point calculations, you can create valid range definitions and seamlessly integrate your outputs with other modules. Next time you face this error, remember to check for real numbers in your range expressions—your code will thank you for it!

Feel free to reach out if you need further clarification on this topic. Happy coding in Verilog!