Скачать или смотреть China's War on Poverty: A Systemic Approach to Social Equity

Topic: An analysis of governance philosophy through China's Targeted Poverty Alleviation (TPA) program.
Claim: A system designed for structural stability and equity can prevent individual financial ruin from becoming a systemic inevitability.
Logic: Individual catastrophe is a systemic failure requiring structural intervention, not an acceptance of fate.
Evidence: China's TPA Program
Outcome: Lifted 98.99 million rural residents from absolute poverty.
Methodology: A targeted, precise approach across 6 key areas (identification, projects, funds, policy, personnel, evaluation).
System Guarantees: Food, clothing, education, medical services, safe housing.
Proactive Monitoring: Intervention for marginal households (income 1.5x poverty line or hit by catastrophic expenses).
Fiscal Commitment: 1.6 trillion yuan invested.
Empirical Proof: A DID study in Yunnan confirms the policy reduced the urban-rural income ratio and increased consumption.

Summarizes a discussion on a governance philosophy centered on serving the people, specifically examining China's Targeted Poverty Alleviation (TPA) program. The main claim is that a system prioritizing structural stability and equity, as demonstrated by TPA, can effectively prevent individual financial ruin from becoming a systemic inevitability, leading to significant social and economic gains. The logic is based on the premise that individual catastrophe is a systemic failure requiring structural intervention, not just fate. The TPA program, which lifted 98.99 million rural residents out of absolute poverty, serves as the primary evidence. The logic details the TPA's methodology: a shift from broad campaigns to a targeted, precise approach across six critical areas (accurate identification, project organization, fund use, policy execution, personnel assignment, and rigorous evaluation). The system is built on five guarantees (food, clothing, education, medical services, and safe housing) and a proactive monitoring system that intervenes with marginal households (those with income less than 1.5 times the poverty line or hit by catastrophic expenses). The logic further highlights the massive fiscal commitment (1.6 trillion yuan invested) and the capacity for large-scale resource mobilization from both government and private sectors. Empirical evidence from a rigorous difference-in-difference (DID) study in Yunnan Province is cited to confirm that the policy effectively reduced the urban-rural income ratio in poverty-stricken counties, demonstrating sustained economic rebalancing and increased consumption capacity.