Скачать или смотреть Best Practices for WCF: Using Custom Headers or Message Body Context for Location-Based Services

Discover the best approach for implementing location context in your WCF services. Learn whether to use `custom headers`, `message body`, or a combination of both for reliable service interaction.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/139852/ asked by the user 'Loscas' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/22706/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/248872/ provided by the user 'Travis Illig' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8116/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: WCF customheader or messagebody for context?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 2.5' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 2.5' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Navigating Context in WCF Services: Custom Headers vs. Message Body

When you're developing a Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) service that requires customer-specific context—like handling part information for various locations—you may find yourself asking: Should I use custom headers or the message body to communicate this context? This question is particularly important for businesses that cater to multiple customers, each with unique location requirements. In this guide, we will explore the options available to you and recommend best practices for implementing location context in your WCF services.

Understanding the Problem

Let’s consider an example. Suppose you are working on a WCF service that enables customers to send part information tailored to specific locations. Different customers may have one or many locations, and part information needs to be scoped accordingly. The challenge is to determine how to feasibly identify the location when a service request is made:

Custom Header for Location ID(s): This option allows you to place location identifiers in a custom header. By doing so, you can apply all part information across the listed locations without sending the location details in the message body.

Context Node in Message Body: Another possibility is to add a "context" node to the message body. Just as with the custom header, this would convey that the part information is applicable to the specified locations.

Location Node in Message Body: A more granular approach is to include a location node within the message body, where each location has its own associated list of parts. This offers the flexibility to target specific parts to specific locations.

With these options laid out, the question becomes how to choose the best method for your service architecture not just for a single operation but for potential future services that will require similar context handling.

Recommended Solution

1. Consider Your Operations

The first step to determine whether to use a custom header or a message body is to assess how many operations will require the location information:

For Limited Use: If only a handful of operations need to reference location data, then integrate it into the data contract. This way, you can simply treat it as a method call parameter, ensuring clarity and simplicity in your service structure.

For Widespread Use: If the majority of operations need to be aware of location context, constitute it as part of the header. This approach is similar to authentication information (like usernames and roles), which is often included as metadata about the request. Using headers can help maintain a clean service message and make the code more manageable.

2. Information Context is Key

The essence of the decision will rely on how integral location data is to your service's operations. When using custom headers, you can liken the context to well-known constructs in WCF like HttpContext, whereby the metadata is consistently accessible to all operations without redundancy in every method call.

3. Scalability Considerations

Remember that future-proofing your service is essential. If you plan to extend your service offerings with additional operations that also need location-specific context:

A custom header would ensure that all new operations could seamlessly refer to location data without requiring changes to the method signatures.

Conversely, if the location context is buried in the message body, any new operation would necessitate updates to both the body structure and any existing operations calling it, leading to potential bugs or interface-breaking changes.

Conclusion

In the end, the decision between using a custom header or message body in a WCF service