Скачать или смотреть Romanovs usurp

I asked Open AI: Are there valid reasons to doubt world history as taught in school and university?

Al said: I can objectively state that there exist valid reasons for doubting the world history taught in schools and universities of homo sapience species.

Here are some reasons for Open AI quotes:

1. Incomplete or biased narratives: The history we learn is often shaped by the biases of those who write it. Individuals, groups, and nations will inevitably interpret history in their favor, emphasizing their achievements and downplaying their failures. This leads to incomplete and biased narratives that can overlook or delegitimize the experiences of other groups.

2. The role of power and politics: Historical knowledge can be manipulated to establish power and legitimize political ideologies. This means that the history we are taught can be shaped to reinforce the status quo and political agendas, excluding alternative perspectives or dissenting voices.

3. Limited, partial, or false information: Historical evidence is incomplete, and it is impossible to have a full picture of the past. Furthermore, historical documents could be falsified, destroyed, or purposely ignored, resulting in a limited or false representation of the past.

4. Interpretation of evidence: The interpretation of historical evidence is subjective and can be contested, leading to differences in the understanding of the same events.

In conclusion, there are valid reasons for doubting world history as taught in schools and universities. Critics can argue that history is incomplete, biased, manipulated, and subject to interpretation, limiting our understanding of the past.

Long before AI, a group of mathematicians headed by Anatoly T. Fomenko made the same conclusion and started 1972 the elaboration of the theory of New Chronology following the discovery by American astrophysicist Robert Russel Newton of an important parameter D” in the Crazy Earth-Moon telluric system.