Скачать или смотреть When Software Teams Quietly Fail (And What Successful Teams Do Differently)

Unsuccessful teams don’t fail because they lack smart engineers. They fail because of how they work: arguing about code behavior instead of writing tests, bikeshedding formatting instead of automating it, manually testing everything, optimizing for ego over outcomes. We break down eight patterns I’ve seen repeatedly in struggling teams and contrast them with what successful teams do differently. If you see your team here, it’s not an accusation—it’s a starting point.


Description


Every failing software team looks unique from the inside. Different products, different tech stacks, different company politics. But zoom out a bit, and the patterns repeat with almost embarrassing consistency.


In this episode, we walk through the most common anti-patterns I’ve seen in unsuccessful teams and contrast them with what successful teams do instead. This isn’t about abstract “best practices.” It’s about day-to-day behavior: pull requests, naming, tests, deployments, documentation, and culture.


We start with the PR debates that never end. Unsuccessful teams argue about code behavior in comments because there are no tests to prove anything. Successful teams write executable examples and let the tests settle the argument. Airbnb evolved from shipping mostly untested code to a culture where untested changes get flagged immediately. Netflix runs nearly a thousand functional tests per PR. They don’t argue about behavior—they prove it.


Then there’s bikeshedding: massive energy spent on snake_case vs camelCase, brace placement, and naming conventions. We have tools for this. Successful teams push formatting and style into automated tooling—black, ruff, gofmt, clippy—so code reviews can focus on design, correctness, and clarity instead of style tribunals.


We explore why manual testing kills velocity, how toxic team dynamics optimize for ego over outcomes (with Google’s Project Aristotle research showing psychological safety as the single most critical factor in team success), why inventing a new project structure in every repo creates chaos, and how the “hero engineer” with a bus factor of one is a structural problem, not an asset.


Documentation and reflection tie it all together. Unsuccessful teams rely on tribal knowledge passed through Slack threads and half-remembered meetings. Successful teams capture decisions in Architecture Decision Records, maintain runbooks, and document the things people repeatedly ask about. And they regularly reflect on whether their process is actually working.


The difference between unsuccessful and successful teams isn’t one big transformation. It’s a long series of small, deliberate corrections. This episode gives you a mirror. If you see your team here, pick one area and move it one step in the right direction.


Key Topics


Arguing about behavior in PRs instead of proving it with tests (Airbnb and Netflix testing culture examples)


Bikeshedding: how Parkinson’s Law of Triviality wastes energy on formatting instead of architecture


The illusion of control in manual testing vs the reality of automated CI/CD pipelines (Netflix’s Spinnaker, Spotify’s 14-day-to-5-minute deployment transformation)


Toxic team dynamics: proving you’re smart vs building something together (Google’s Project Aristotle findings on psychological safety)


Why inventing a new structure in every repo creates cognitive overhead and slows reviews


The bus factor of one: why hero engineers are single points of failure (research shows 10 of 25 popular GitHub projects had bus factor of 1)


Documentation as a product: Architecture Decision Records, runbooks, and capturing knowledge before people leave


Never reflecting on how you work: why continuous improvement through retrospectives is critical (Spotify and Atlassian retro practices)


From quiet failure to deliberate success: picking one area and making small, deliberate corrections


Practical starting points: automate what can be automated, standardize what can be standardized, document what others will need, share knowledge instead of hoarding it


Get full access to Compiling Ideas at patrickkoss.substack.com/subscribe (https://patrickkoss.substack.com/subs...)