Скачать или смотреть Understanding Why XPath Fails to Find Non-Hidden Elements in Selenium

In this blog, we explore why XPath queries for non-hidden elements do not work as expected in Selenium and how to fix this issue effectively.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63812992/ asked by the user 'Ivan Yakushenko' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12932172/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63813110/ provided by the user 'JaSON' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/10682289/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why doesn't the search for an element that does not contain a value work in xpath?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Why XPath Fails to Find Non-Hidden Elements in Selenium

Working with Selenium and XPath can sometimes feel like navigating a maze, especially when things aren't working the way we expect them to. A common hurdle developers face is trying to search for elements that are not hidden, only to find out that their XPath queries aren't returning the expected results. In this guide, we'll dissect this problem and offer a practical solution.

The Problem

Imagine you have an HTML page structured like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this example, there are two <input> fields:

A hidden input containing an error message.

A visible text input designed for user interaction.

The challenge arises when trying to write an XPath expression that excludes hidden elements, as shown below:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This XPath aims to identify input elements based on specific conditions, but it doesn't yield the expected visible element.

Why Does This Happen?

The issue here lies in how the contains() function is being applied within your XPath expression. The contains() function checks for the presence of a substring within a given string. If we apply it directly to the attributes of elements like type, it won’t effectively filter elements as intended.

A Practical Solution

To fix the issue and effectively search for non-hidden elements, you can refine your XPath expression as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Breakdown of the Improved XPath

//input: This part locates all <input> elements.

@ *[contains(...)]: The @ * selector applies conditions across all attributes of the input elements, searching for specific keywords within any attribute.

and not(@ *[contains(., "hidden")]): This condition excludes any input element that has a "hidden" attribute, focusing only on visible elements.

Why This Works

Flexible Attribute Matching: Using @ * allows the search across all attributes rather than a specific one, facilitating broader matches.

Exclusion of Hidden Elements: The modified logic with not() ensures that any element recognized as "hidden" will be excluded from the results.

Conclusion

Navigating XPath in Selenium to find non-hidden elements can be tricky due to the nuances in how queries interpret attributes. By refining your XPath to utilize broader selection and exclusion conditions effectively, you can simplify your search process and reduce headaches as you automate your testing tasks.

By following the outlined solution, you can confidently identify the elements you need, leaving no room for confusion between visible and hidden inputs.

Feel free to test the improved XPath and let us know your feedback!