Скачать или смотреть Resolving Django Queryset Distinct Issues with Subqueries

Learn how to effectively aggregate distinct counts in Django without using RawSQL. Discover a simplified approach to resolve queryset conflicts in your Django application.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/61514714/ asked by the user 'Blackdoor' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13437451/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62357912/ provided by the user 'Blackdoor' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13437451/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: django queryset can not distinct the result with using Subquery?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Distinct Issue with Django Querysets

When working with Django, one often encounters the challenge of ensuring accurate data aggregation without resorting to complex RawSQL queries. This is particularly important for scenarios involving subqueries and distinct counting of related objects. If you've ever faced the issue of obtaining conflicting results when fetching counts based on distinct users, you're not alone. This guide will walk you through the problem and present a straightforward solution.

The Problem

In a Django application, suppose you have three models: Video, Work, and ShareRecord. Each Video can have multiple Works, and each Work can have various ShareRecords. When attempting to aggregate the counts of users who interacted with these videos, one might run into issues with counting multiple interactions from the same users.

Example Scenario

You want to gather data that indicates:

Total number of works associated with a specific video.

The number of distinct users who created those works (the makers).

The number of distinct users who shared those works.

In your original attempt using two queries (qset1 and qset2), you noticed that qset1 provided correct results with the use of RawSQL, whereas qset2 returned incorrect results because it did not distinctively exclude the same users.

The Solution

Instead of relying on RawSQL or complex subqueries, you can simplify the way you collect these counts by leveraging Django's ORM capabilities. Here’s how to achieve the correct results using chainable relationships in your queryset.

Simple Aggregation with Count

Using the power of the Django ORM, you can achieve the desired results with concise annotations. Below is the recommended approach:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of the Code

Count('works_of_video', distinct=True): This counts the total number of works associated with each video, ensuring that only unique works are counted.

Count('works_of_video__maker', distinct=True): This counts the distinct makers of the works, effectively filtering out duplicate entries from the same user creating multiple works for the same video.

Count('works_of_video__share_records_of_work', distinct=True): This counts the total unique share records connected to the works.

Count('works_of_video__share_records_of_work__sharer', distinct=True): This counts the unique users who shared the works, ensuring distinctiveness by avoiding duplicates in the count.

Benefits of This Approach

Efficiency: Reduces complexity in your code by avoiding RawSQL queries.

Readability: The annotations allow for a cleaner, more understandable code structure.

Maintainability: As your models or queries evolve, making adjustments becomes easier without the need to restructure SQL syntax.

Conclusion

When dealing with intricate relationships in Django and needing to aggregate data across them, you can achieve accurate results without the overhead of RawSQL. By utilizing Django's annotation and counting methods directly on your querysets, you facilitate both clarity and functionality in your code. With this approach, you can confidently retrieve distinct counts and ensure that your application behaves as expected.

Now it's time to implement this method in your own project, improving both performance and maintainability of your Django applications!