Скачать или смотреть Solving the LookupObject Error: A Simple Solution for C# and LINQ Problems

Learn how to fix the common error in C# related to creating constant values of type 'LookupObject'. Explore effective solutions with practical examples.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/71974926/ asked by the user 'Dolla' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12705918/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72000881/ provided by the user 'Dolla' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12705918/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Unable to create a constant value of type 'LookupObject'. Only primitive types or enumeration types are supported in this context

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Introduction

If you are working with C# and LINQ, you may have encountered the frustrating error: "Unable to create a constant value of type 'LookupObject'. Only primitive types or enumeration types are supported in this context." This can arise when you attempt to compare complex objects in your queries that involve both in-memory collections and database entities. In this guide, we will walk through this issue and provide a clear, simple solution to help you move forward with your project.

Understanding the Problem

The error arises when you try to use a complex object (in this case, an instance of LookupObject) in a LINQ query against a database. Specifically, the problem occurs when comparing fields in a LINQ query that involves loading data into memory from the database and performing checks with a list of in-memory objects.

Context of the Issue

Suppose you have a database table which contains AGN_RestrictionContact_Involvement_PositionLinked along with a formModel containing properties such as ContactId and PositionsInvolvement. You are trying to check for conditions between database records and a list of in-memory objects based on user interactions. This dual connection can lead to the error when the required comparisons involve complex object types.

Solution Breakdown

The solution to this issue is straightforward: convert your LINQ query result into a list using the ToList() method. Let’s break this down into actionable steps.

Step 1: Modify Your LINQ Query

Originally, you might have a LINQ query that looks something like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

To rectify the issue, simply append .ToList() to the query:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Utilize This List in Your Checks

With the conversion to a list, your subsequent operations can operate without causing the aforementioned error. For instance, you can now comfortably check against your in-memory list of positions like so:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 3: Remove Unwanted Positions

Finally, if there are any positions that need to be removed based on the check, you can process them in a loop easily:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

By using .ToList(), you allow the query to execute in-memory and avoid the pitfalls of comparing complex objects directly in a LINQ-to-Entities context. This simple adjustment resolves the error associated with 'LookupObject' types and ensures smooth execution of your queries.

If you ever find yourself stuck with similar issues in C# or LINQ, remember this approach. It can save you time and frustration while programming.

Thank you for visiting our blog! If you have any questions or additional tips, feel free to leave a comment below.