Скачать или смотреть 🔥Newsom Fraud Worse Than Even Trump Knew

For a gift that’s truly unforgettable, head to http://BookByAnyone.com
President Donald Trump has long argued that California’s leadership under Governor Gavin Newsom represents everything wrong with Democrat governance: high taxes, sanctuary state policies, government waste, and taxpayer-funded activism. Now, newly highlighted state expenditure records are intensifying that debate. Reports show that more than $100 million in public funds flowed to CHIRLA, the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, a nonprofit organization known for advocating immigration reform, organizing protests, and supporting policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. Critics say the funding raises serious questions about how taxpayer dollars are being allocated and whether political activism is being indirectly subsidized by the state.

Supporters of Trump argue this confirms his long-standing warnings about what he calls “the Democrat blueprint” — using government programs and nonprofit partnerships to advance progressive policy agendas. They contend that California families facing high living costs, rising crime concerns, and infrastructure challenges may question whether state resources are being directed appropriately. With Newsom widely viewed as a potential 2028 presidential contender, the controversy could become a national campaign issue, particularly in swing states and among independent voters sensitive to government spending and border security.

Polling data shows immigration and border enforcement remain top concerns for many Americans. Surveys consistently indicate significant support for stricter border controls, increased deportations of criminal offenders, and stronger enforcement of existing immigration laws. Republicans are currently viewed by many voters as more trusted on border security and immigration policy, and party strategists argue that connecting immigration enforcement to economic relief — including housing costs, public benefits spending, and job competition — could shape future election messaging.

At the same time, political tensions within the Republican Party are emerging. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer has publicly called on Senate leadership to prioritize the SAVE Act, legislation aimed at tightening voter identification standards and election security measures. Some conservative activists argue that party unity is essential if Republicans hope to maintain legislative control and advance the broader MAGA agenda.

Looking ahead to upcoming elections, both parties are framing the stakes as historic. Democrats emphasize protecting social programs and progressive reforms, while Republicans focus on border control, fiscal responsibility, and economic growth. As the debate over taxpayer funding, immigration policy, and federal enforcement continues, the broader question remains whether voters will prioritize economic stability, border security, or social equity when casting their ballots.