Скачать или смотреть JUST IN:PI EURO APPROVED IN19EU COUNTRIES REGULATORS SAY NO INVESTIGATION MiCA CLAIM!PI NEW UPDATE

🚨 PI NETWORK CLAIMS EU APPROVAL IN 19 COUNTRIES - BUT REGULATORS SAY THERE'S NO PROOF 🚨

Pi Network announced that "Pi Euro" is officially recognized and legally accepted in 19 out of 27 EU member states under MiCA regulations. The community is celebrating.

But there's a MASSIVE problem:
❌ Zero official documentation
❌ No regulatory authority confirmation
❌ Exchanges actively distancing themselves
❌ European regulators issuing warnings

Is this legitimate regulatory approval or dangerous misinformation?

In this investigation, I break down:
✅ Pi Network's specific EU approval claims
✅ What MiCA approval ACTUALLY requires
✅ Why there's no official documentation
✅ How exchanges are responding (distancing themselves)
✅ European regulatory experts' warnings
✅ The difference between claims and verified approval
✅ Legal risks for Pi and users
✅ What Pi holders need to demand right now

🎯 TIMESTAMPS BELOW 👇

This isn't about being bearish or bullish on Pi. This is about separating verified regulatory approval from marketing claims that could expose millions of users to legal and financial risk.

⏱️ TIMESTAMPS:
Pi Claims EU Approval: No Proof Found
Welcome to TJ Crypto World
Why This Could Be Dangerous Misinformation
The Claim: Pi Euro in 19 EU Countries
Exchanges & Aggregators Backing Away
LIKE & SUBSCRIBE (Protect Yourself From Misleading Claims!)
Massive Pressure on Pi Core Team
What This Means for Pi Holders
Final Assessment: Demand Official Documentation
Don't Miss This! (Final Call to Action)
Next Video: 3 Projects With Questionable Regulatory Claims

🏦 HOW EXCHANGES ARE RESPONDING:
*CoinGecko, Binance & Major Platforms:*
Subtly distancing from legitimacy narratives
Clarifying that price displays ≠ regulatory approval
Reminding users prices often represent IOUs/wrapped versions
NOT providing endorsements or compliance verification

*Critical Distinction:*
Price aggregators mechanically display trading activity. They DO NOT verify:
❌ Regulatory compliance
❌ Legal status
❌ Jurisdictional clearances
❌ Official approval

*Why This Matters:*
If Pi had legitimate MiCA approval, major exchanges would be racing to list it properly. Instead, they're keeping distance and issuing disclaimers.

⚠️ EUROPEAN REGULATORY EXPERTS' WARNINGS:

*Key Concerns:*
🔸 Claims of cross-border approval MUST come from official EU institutions
🔸 MiCA provides structured path, but Pi hasn't appeared in registries
🔸 Circulating claims risk misleading users about legal status
🔸 Jurisdictions strictly enforce compliance for publicly marketed assets
🔸 Without formal documentation, claims could have legal consequences

*Regulatory Monitoring:*
Authorities are watching this situation closely. False claims about legal status carry serious enforcement risk.

📋 WHAT PI CORE TEAM MUST PROVIDE:

*Transparency Demands:*
✅ Official documentation from EU regulatory authorities
✅ Registry entries proving MiCA compliance
✅ Authorization letters from 19 national financial authorities
✅ Clear roadmap with verifiable milestones
✅ Accelerated KYC processing timeline
✅ Open mainnet activation specifications

*Current Reality:*
Communication through vague announcements and community moderator messaging is insufficient for regulatory claims.

*What Changed:*
Community no longer accepts aspirational roadmaps. They demand verifiable progress with official documentation.

🎯 CRITICAL QUESTIONS PI HOLDERS SHOULD ASK:

️⃣ Where is the official documentation from EU institutions?
️⃣ Which specific regulatory authorities granted approval?
️⃣ Can Pi show registry entries proving MiCA compliance?
️⃣ Why are exchanges distancing themselves if approval is real?
️⃣ Why do European regulatory experts contradict these claims?

If Pi Core Team cannot produce official documentation, treat claims as aspirational marketing, NOT accomplished regulatory milestones.