The Necessity of the Atonement (Remastered)

A sermon by Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones on atonement ― Great Biblical Doctrines playlist:    • The Eternal Decrees of God (Remastered)  

Sermon Description
What does the Bible mean when it calls God both just and the justifier? Moreover, was the atonement really necessary? Were there any other ways? In this sermon on the atonement, Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones explores these questions in his ongoing series of the Doctrine of the Atonement. After he reviews his previous seven arguments for the Protestant view of the atonement, he gives his final and last reason: the Bible emphasizes the death on the cross as an absolute necessity. By exploring Jesus’s words in the Garden of Gethsemane and epistles of Paul, Dr. Lloyd-Jones gives a clear picture for the biblical and Protestant view of the atonement. Dr. Lloyd-Jones also navigates through some objections against both the general doctrine of the atonement and the specific doctrine of the penal substitutionary atonement. This sermon by Dr. Lloyd-Jones is helpful as he gives arguments for and against this glorious doctrine of the atonement and offers robust understanding of salvation and justification by Christ alone.

Sermon Breakdown
The sermon begins by reviewing the previous discussion on the false theories of atonement and the substitutionary view of atonement.
The substitutionary view teaches that Jesus vicariously suffered the penalty of sin as a substitute for believers.
There are 7 arguments for the substitutionary view of atonement:
Analogy from OT sacrifices
NT teaches Jesus saves through his death
Certain NT terms like ransom, propitiation, reconciliation
Certain NT terms teach substitution like "for us" and "for our sins"
Statements emphasizing union with Christ teach substitution
Statements saying Jesus' death frees us from the law teach substitution
Statements emphasizing God's activity in Jesus' death teach substitution
An 8th argument is that the Bible teaches Jesus' death was necessary. Jesus' agony in Gethsemane and cry of dereliction on the cross show his death was necessary.
Romans 3:25-26 directly states Jesus' death was necessary to demonstrate God's righteousness.
Hebrews 2:9 and Romans 8:32 suggest Jesus' death was necessary.
The sermon then addresses objections to the substitutionary view of atonement.
The view that God's love alone is enough fails to account for God's justice and holiness.
The view that substitution derogates from God's character fails to recognize Jesus willingly volunteered to die.
The view that Paul invented substitution fails to recognize Jesus taught he would give his life as a ransom for many. Jesus couldn't fully explain substitution before his death due to the disciples' lack of understanding.
The view that substitution portrays God as reluctant to forgive fails to recognize God's love initiated the plan of salvation. Substitution supremely demonstrates God's love.
The law must be satisfied through both Jesus' passive obedience in dying as our substitute and active obedience in perfectly keeping the law. Christians are freed from the law's condemnation through union with Christ.