Скачать или смотреть The Great Debate: Terraform vs eksctl for AWS EKS Cluster Creation

Explore the benefits of using `Terraform` vs `eksctl` for creating and maintaining AWS EKS clusters. What should you choose for better infrastructure management?
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/65497019/ asked by the user 'DmitrySemenov' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1233751/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/67412834/ provided by the user 'Dirk Jablonski' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5051913/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: AWS EKS from scratch - terraform or eksctl?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
The Great Debate: Terraform vs eksctl for AWS EKS Cluster Creation

When it comes to building and managing an AWS EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Service) cluster, developers often find themselves at a crossroads, trying to decide between two popular tools: Terraform and eksctl. Each of these tools has its own strengths and weaknesses, and choosing the right one can have significant impacts on your infrastructure management. In this guide, we'll explore the benefits and drawbacks of both Terraform and eksctl, especially in terms of long-term maintenance and infrastructure as code (IaC).

Understanding AWS EKS

AWS EKS is a managed service that simplifies running Kubernetes clusters in the AWS cloud. Kubernetes is an open-source container orchestration tool that automates deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications. Since many organizations rely on Kubernetes, understanding how to efficiently create and manage EKS clusters is essential for streamlined operations.

The Case for Terraform

Terraform is an open-source infrastructure as code software tool created by HashiCorp. It allows you to define and provision data center infrastructure using a high-level configuration language. So, why might you consider Terraform over eksctl?

Benefits of Using Terraform

Declarative Configuration: With Terraform, you can declaratively define your entire infrastructure in code files. This enables version control and repeatability.

Infrastructure as Code (IaC): Terraform strongly promotes IaC principles, allowing you to manage your infrastructure similarly to software development. Keeping everything in versioned configuration files means that you can track and manage changes over time.

Extensive Community and Providers: Terraform has a rich ecosystem, with a wide array of providers and modules available for various components of your stack.

Better Change Management: Terraform can handle complex changes more seamlessly. For example, if you want to scale a node group, you can simply update the configuration file and apply the changes with Terraform commands, ensuring that everything stays consistent and under control.

Long-Term Maintenance with Terraform

Terraform’s design enhances long-term maintenance compared to eksctl. The separation of configuration and execution allows for clear documentation, better tracking of changes, and improved team collaboration. It also means that deploying updates can be done more systematically, reducing the risk of errors.

The Limitations of eksctl

While eksctl is tailored for ease of use and quick setup of EKS clusters, it comes with notable drawbacks that may hinder effective infrastructure management.

Drawbacks of Using eksctl

Command Dependency: With eksctl, many changes require specific commands instead of simply modifying a configuration file. For example, to scale a node group, you have to use a command like eksctl scale nodegroup rather than just updating the cluster configuration.

Limited Support for IaC: Unlike Terraform, changes made in the eksctl cluster.yaml file do not automatically apply to existing clusters. This means that without using the right commands, your configurations can become stale or inconsistent.

Less Control: For teams looking to implement GitOps methodologies, using a tool like eksctl, which requires manual command execution for updates, may result in less control and a greater chance of human error.

Why eksctl Might Not Be Ideal

Considering that eksctl is created by Weaveworks, a company known for advocating GitOps, it can be quite disappointing that the tool does not fully support fundamental IaC practices. This lack of fundamental principles can contribute to future complexities, especial