Скачать или смотреть Understanding the git revert -m Process: Merging Branches Without Losing Changes

Learn how to effectively manage and merge branches in Git, especially when handling reverts. Discover the implications of using `git revert -m` and ensure your commits are accurately reflected in the master branch.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/63597335/ asked by the user 'HAL9000' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1889762/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/63598115/ provided by the user 'David Sugar' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12058959/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Merging a git revert -m into the master branch

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the git revert -m Process: Merging Branches Without Losing Changes

When working with Git, it’s not uncommon to encounter complex branching situations, particularly when you need to revert merges. This post will delve into a specific scenario involving git revert -m and clarify why certain changesets may not appear in the master branch after performing merges.

The Scenario: A Git Trouble

Imagine you have the following branching structure:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this setup:

M represents the master branch.

B is a branch where you made some modifications (commits 1, 2, and 3).

C is another branch where you integrated changes from B.

Initial Steps Taken

You pulled the changesets (1, 2, 3) from branch B into C.

Later, you decided to revert this merge using git revert -m.

After making more commits in both branches, you merged branch C into M.

Finally, you merged branch B back into M.

Confusion Arises

After performing these merges, you noticed that the changesets (1, 2, 3) from branch B were not included in the master branch M. This leads to the question: Is there an error in this procedure, or could it be a bug?

The Explanation: Understanding Merging and Reverting

The Merging Process

When you merged branch B into M, Git only included commit 4 and onward from branch B. Why? Because commits 1, 2, and 3 were already part of branch C which had been merged into M.

The Role of git revert -m

Reverting a merge commit using git revert -m does not simply "undo" the merge. Instead, it removes the changes that were added by that merge commit. This nuanced behavior means:

Any commits contained in the reverted merge (in this case, 1, 2, 3 in branch B) are effectively neutralized.

When branch B is later merged into M, Git identifies that commits 1, 2, and 3 are not necessary to include again in M because they are considered already present in C (which had reverted them).

Future Merges

One crucial point to keep in mind is that when reverting merges:

Future merges might require manual intervention: Once you revert a merge, the repository history changes in such a way that future merges can become more complicated. You may need to resolve conflicts or make manual adjustments to ensure that the intended changes are accurately reflected.

Conclusion

In summary, there wasn’t an error or a bug in your procedure; it was simply the behavior of Git at work. Understanding how merges and reverts function will better equip you to manage your repositories effectively and make better decisions on branching strategies. Always remember:

Reverting a merge doesn't undo it; it removes the added content.

Be prepared for potential complexities in future merges after a revert.

By being aware of these intricacies, you can streamline your workflow and avoid losing crucial changes in your projects!