Скачать или смотреть How to Provide Default Implementations for Protocols Using Enums in Swift?

Learn how to give `default implementations` to a protocol implemented by an enum in Swift, and understand the limitations and best practices in doing so.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/69468583/ asked by the user 'Sergio' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9451152/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/69468862/ provided by the user 'Itai Ferber' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/169394/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to give a default implementations to a protocol implemented by an enum?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Provide Default Implementations for Protocols Using Enums in Swift?

When working with enums and protocols in Swift, one of the common questions developers encounter is how to assign default implementations to protocol methods for different cases of an enum. In this guide, we’ll answer the question of whether it's possible to provide unique method implementations for each case of an enum that conforms to a protocol. Let’s dive into the details!

The Problem Statement

Suppose you have defined a protocol named MyProtocol with a method called myFunction(). You also have an enum, MyEnum, that conforms to this protocol. The challenge is to provide distinct, default implementations for the protocol method for each case of the enum. Below is a simplified structure of these components:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

You might be tempted to create extensions that define distinct implementations for each enum case as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, is this approach feasible in Swift?

Understanding the Limitations

Unfortunately, the approach of giving each enum case its own distinct type is not supported in Swift. Here’s why:

No Distinct Type for Each Case: Enum cases do not create their own types in Swift. They are distinguished by their values, but not by type. This means that you cannot provide separate implementations based solely on the enum case in the way you might expect.

Single Protocol Implementation: Swift doesn’t allow you to provide multiple implementations of a protocol requirement for the same type. This means that you can’t provide different implementations for each case of an enum under the same protocol.

The Recommended Solution: Using a Switch Case

Given these limitations, the best practice is to utilize a switch statement within a single method implementation. Here's how you can do this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of This Approach

Single Responsibility: This method adheres to the single responsibility principle by managing all case-specific logic within one function.

Clarity: It provides a clear blueprint for how each case of the enum behaves when the method is called.

Conclusion

While it may initially seem limiting that you cannot directly provide different default implementations for protocol methods based on enum cases in Swift, using a switch statement within a single implementation allows for clear and maintainable code. By embracing this approach, you can manage your enum cases effectively while fulfilling the protocol requirements.

Feel free to reach out with any questions, and happy coding with Swift!