Скачать или смотреть Solving the Stack Overflow Issue in .Net Core 3.1 Xunit Tests with Custom Fluent Validators

Discover how to fix the stack overflow errors arising from custom FluentValidator usage in .Net Core 3.1 Xunit tests. Learn proven solutions and best practices for functional testing.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64489184/ asked by the user 'NoStuff' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/11783966/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64489746/ provided by the user 'E. Shcherbo' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8715436/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: .Net Core 3.1 Xunit runnig tests causes stack overflow error when I create new Custom FluentValidator object in fixture class

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Introduction

As developers, encountering errors during testing can be a frustrating experience, especially when they seem obscure. Recently, developers faced a challenge while writing Xunit tests for .Net Core 3.1, specifically related to using custom FluentValidation validators. This guide aims to clarify the issue at hand — a stack overflow error that occurs when creating new instances of your custom validators and how to solve it.

The Problem

When attempting to create instances of custom validators, such as AddressValidator or ProductValidator, within a test fixture class, users received the following stack overflow error message:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This indicates that there is an unintended recursion or an issue in how the validators are defined, leading to infinite looping during instantiation.

The Solution

To resolve this issue, we need to focus on how the validator rules are defined. The culprit lies within the custom rules, particularly the implementation of the PrimaryKeyIdRule method.

Understanding the Validator

To start, let's analyze the AddressValidator implementation. Here’s the relevant code snippet:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In the constructor above, three properties are being validated using a custom rule defined as PrimaryKeyIdRule.

Identifying the Recursive Call

The issue arises within the definition of the PrimaryKeyIdRule. Here is the problematic implementation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this method, you're recursively calling PrimaryKeyIdRule for the integer version without any exit condition, which causes a stack overflow due to infinite recursion. You need to ensure that the method calls the appropriate overload.

Correct Implementation

To properly implement the method without causing a stack overflow, modify the method to differentiate between types:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Fixing the Overloads

To eliminate the recursive call, ensure that each overload is correctly defined and can call its respective rules without entering an infinite loop. Consider simplifying your rules or adopting a single overload that can handle both int and long types, if applicable.

Conclusion

In this article, we have examined the stack overflow error experienced in Xunit tests while using custom FluentValidation validators in .Net Core 3.1. By understanding the recursive nature of method calls in your validator implementations, you can avoid these pitfalls and create robust test cases without running into unintended errors.

With this knowledge, you can ensure your unit tests remain a useful tool, bolstering your code's reliability and performance!

Additional Tips

Regularly review your code for potential infinite recursion.

Utilize comprehensive logging to intercept error points during testing.

Write comprehensive unit tests for your validators to catch these errors before they trigger stack overflows.

By implementing these practices, you can further enhance the stability of your applications and enjoy a smoother development process.