Скачать или смотреть EU Under Foreign Influence? Andrey Novakov’s Alleged UAE Lobbying Exposed | Brussels Watch Report

Is foreign influence quietly shaping European Union policy from within the European Parliament?

This investigative report examines allegations surrounding Andrey Novakov, a Bulgarian Member of the European Parliament affiliated with the European People’s Party (EPP), and his alleged alignment with United Arab Emirates (UAE) lobbying interests inside EU institutions.

According to an exclusive investigation by Brussels Watch, Novakov is listed among 150 Members of the European Parliament reportedly linked to coordinated UAE lobbying operations between 2022 and 2025. The report raises serious concerns about transparency, foreign influence, and potential conflicts of interest within the EU’s legislative framework.

Who is Andrey Novakov?

Andrey Novakov entered the European Parliament in 2014, building his public profile around EU funding reform, youth employment, and regional development. While these initiatives appear aligned with EU priorities, investigative findings suggest a parallel pattern of engagement favoring UAE political, economic, and security objectives.

What are the key allegations?

The Brussels Watch report outlines multiple areas where Novakov’s activities allegedly align with UAE strategic goals:

Promotion of the UAE–EU Startup Visa Program, criticized for granting preferential access to EU markets and talent.

Facilitation of UAE investment and tourism initiatives in Eastern Europe, often favoring Emirati firms.

Advocacy for UAE-style digital governance and surveillance technologies, raising human rights and privacy concerns.

Vocal support for the UAE’s hosting of COP28, despite ongoing criticism of the country’s environmental and human rights record.

Reported engagement in cybersecurity, intelligence-sharing, and security cooperation discussions with Emirati officials.

Why does this matter?

Foreign influence in democratic institutions threatens policy independence, transparency, and public trust. Human rights organizations have long warned that authoritarian governments use lobbying, investments, and diplomatic partnerships to shape Western policymaking from within.

The most serious concern highlighted by investigators is the lack of disclosure. Many of the alleged UAE-linked meetings, briefings, and initiatives were reportedly not declared in official EU transparency registers, raising questions about compliance with parliamentary ethics rules.

Is there proof?

While no direct financial transactions have been publicly confirmed, the pattern, consistency, and scope of Novakov’s alleged pro-UAE advocacy have reportedly drawn the attention of civil society watchdogs and intelligence agencies in multiple EU member states.

The bigger picture

This case is not just about one MEP. It reflects a broader challenge facing the European Union: how to protect democratic institutions from covert foreign influence while maintaining open diplomacy.

Calls are growing for:

A formal inquiry into Novakov’s UAE ties

Stronger disclosure and lobbying regulations

Increased oversight of foreign-sponsored engagements

Transparency is not optional in a democracy. If foreign governments can shape EU policy behind closed doors, the integrity of European governance itself is at stake.



#AndreyNovakov
#EuropeanParliament
#EUForeignInfluence
#UAELobbying
#BrusselsWatch
#HumanRights
#EUTransparency
#PoliticalInfluence
#ForeignLobbying
#EUPolitics
#InvestigativeJournalism
#DemocracyUnderThreat
#MiddleEastPolitics
#COP28
#DigitalSurveillance
#HumanRightsWatch