Learn why comparing a pointer passed by address to `NULL` yields unexpected results in C, and discover how to correctly handle pointer dereferencing in your functions.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64435914/ asked by the user 'Amarth Gûl' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7693707/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64435964/ provided by the user 'Vlad from Moscow' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2877241/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Comparing pointer value passed into a function by address with null resulting in reversed result
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the NULL Pointer Issue in Function Calls
In programming languages like C, pointers are powerful tools that provide flexibility in memory handling. However, they can also lead to confusion, especially when it comes to understanding their values and addresses. A common issue arises when comparing a pointer passed to a function by address to NULL, which can lead to unexpected results. In this guide, we will dissect this problem, with a specific focus on pointers and reference handling, and we’ll provide an approach to resolve these issues effectively.
The Problem
Consider this situation: you have a function designed to take a pointer and ascertain whether that pointer is NULL or not. You declare a pointer variable and then pass its address to the function. However, the result states that the pointer is "not null," even though you expected to confirm it was NULL. This can be perplexing, particularly if you work with pointer variables frequently.
Here’s the sample code that illustrates the issue:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
When the function is called with &setList, the output incorrectly states "not null". Why does this happen?
The Root Cause of the Issue
Understanding Addresses and Values
When you declare a variable like this:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
You have allocated memory for setList. However, the address of setList itself is not equal to NULL. Instead, it is the value stored within that memory location that is NULL. This distinction is crucial for understanding how pointers work in C.
Type Consideration in Function Calls
When you pass the address of setList to the function, the type of the argument is a pointer to a pointer (void ** in this case). Here's what happens in the function:
Inside the function, you might be checking the pointer directly like so:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
This will not yield the correct result since head - the address of setList - is not NULL. To properly check the value pointed by head, you must dereference it.
Solution to the Problem
To accurately check if setList is null, you should modify the function to handle the pointer correctly. Here’s how you can do it:
Correcting the Function Definition
Instead of defining the function as int func(void *head);, change it to:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Implementing the Dereferencing Check
Now, inside the function, you can safely dereference the pointer:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Full Working Example
Here's the complete example to illustrate the fixes:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Conclusion
By understanding the way pointers and their values interact in a C program, you can avoid common pitfalls like the NULL comparison issue we've explored here. Remember, it’s not just about what address you are working with, but also the value that exists at that address that matters. Always ensure you’re dereferencing appropriately when passing pointers to functions to get the expected results!
By applying these approaches, you can enhance your ability to work effectively with pointers in C programming. Happy coding!
Информация по комментариям в разработке