Скачать или смотреть Solving Cannot resolve method 'setMin' in 'Object' Error with Java Factory Design Pattern

Learn how to create a generic factory in Java that handles specific classes, resolving common type-related issues and enhancing code reliability.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62656033/ asked by the user 'Artur' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/6643395/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62656211/ provided by the user 'Joni' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/318758/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Java. Factory creation should return Generic class

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Problem: Returning Specific Classes with a Factory

In Java, using factories to create objects can simplify the process of managing the instantiation of classes. However, sometimes you might run into issues that stem from the type system—especially when using generics. One common error developers encounter is the Cannot resolve method 'setMin' in 'Object', which typically indicates that the compiler is unable to determine the specific type being returned by the factory method.

In this post, we will explore how to effectively implement a factory that returns specific classes, utilizing generics and helping you avoid type-related errors.

The Code Breakdown

Let's look at the pertinent parts of the Java code that pressed this issue.

We have a simple design involving:

Enums for Columns: Columns and ColumnType define types of data.

Filter Classes: Two filter classes NumericFilter and StringFilter that provide methods for setting filters.

Factory Class: ColumnFilterFactory returns the appropriate filter based on the column type.

The Problematic Line

Here’s the line where the error occurs:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The error arises because the return type of getFilter is loosely defined as T, meaning the compiler treats it as an Object, hence it doesn’t recognize the setMin method specific to NumericFilter or any other specific filter class.

The Solution: Use an Intermediate Variable

To resolve this issue, you need to help the compiler understand the type you expect from the factory. The solution is to declare an intermediate variable that explicitly utilizes the correct type.

Step-by-Step Implementation

Declare an Intermediate Variable: By storing the result of getFilter in a variable of the specific type NumericFilter, we assert the type for the subsequent method call.

Here’s the corrected line:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Full Example Implementation

Here’s how the adjusted main method looks:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

By using an intermediate variable to specify the type, we not only avoid the compiler error Cannot resolve method 'setMin' in 'Object', but also produce clearer and safer code. Always remember that Java's type system benefits from explicitness, especially when working with generics in factory patterns.

Feel free to apply this concept within your own Java projects where factory patterns are utilized. Happy coding!