Скачать или смотреть Resolving the Kubernetes PVC Stuck in Pending Issue with GlusterFS and Heketi

Discover how to troubleshoot and resolve the issue of PersistentVolumeClaims remaining in a `Pending` state when using GlusterFS and Heketi in Kubernetes.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64564028/ asked by the user 'Vahid Alimohamadi' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1896107/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64569986/ provided by the user 'Vahid Alimohamadi' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1896107/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: glusterfs, heketi and kubernetes auto provisioning problem

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Kubernetes PVC Pending Issue with GlusterFS and Heketi

When working with Kubernetes, one of the most common challenges developers face is dealing with PersistentVolumeClaims (PVCs) that remain in a Pending state. This issue often arises when configuring storage solutions like GlusterFS alongside Heketi in a Kubernetes environment. In this guide, we will dissect a real-world scenario where a PVC failed to provision and remained stuck in the pending state, and we will provide a clear solution for how to rectify the problem.

The Problem

The situation at hand involves the creation of a PersistentVolumeClaim (PVC) using a StorageClass that utilizes GlusterFS. Despite having a Gluster node and successfully testing the Heketi CLI to create volumes, the PVC consistently fails to provision and remains in a Pending state. This can be frustrating, especially when dealing with production workloads.

Initial Setup

The StorageClass configuration provided is as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This configuration specifies that volumes are to be created with replication settings, which may not be supported with only a single Gluster node.

The Symptoms

Upon creating the PVC using the following specification:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The PVC remains in the Pending state, as observed with the command:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The detailed PVC description reveals events indicating provisioning failures with messages suggesting a failure in creating the volume.

The Solution

Upon investigating the issue further, a key finding emerged regarding the configuration of the volume type in the StorageClass. When operating with a GlusterFS cluster that consists of only a single node, the volumetype should be specified as none rather than under a replication scheme. This adjustment is pivotal in ensuring that volumes can be created correctly without requiring replication across multiple nodes.

Revised StorageClass Configuration

To resolve the pending PVC issue, modify the volume type in your StorageClass configuration like so:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This change allows the PVC to provision successfully, as it eliminates the need for replication that cannot be satisfied with only one node in the GlusterFS setup.

Conclusion

In summary, if you're experiencing issues with your PVCs remaining in a Pending state while using GlusterFS and Heketi on a single-node cluster, adjusting the volumetype to none is an effective solution. Always ensure that your storage configuration aligns with the capabilities of your infrastructure to prevent such provisioning issues.

By following the steps and adjustments outlined above, you should be able to resolve similar problems swiftly and efficiently, paving the way for streamlined deployments in your Kubernetes environment.