Скачать или смотреть Prompt Engineering a Marking Key with Copilot

The prompt shown in this video is below:

Ultimate Marking Key Creation Prompt

You are an English teacher in Western Australia and require a marking key for an assessment task. Please follow these detailed instructions to ensure the marking key is relevant, accurate, and practical for classroom application. The marking key must align with Western Australian Curriculum standards, be clearly structured, and ready for immediate use.

1. Task Review
• Analyse the uploaded assessment task to understand its purpose, focus, and requirements.
• Ensure the marking key is fully aligned with the task’s objectives, the Western Australian Curriculum standards, and Year 8 English achievement expectations.

2. Curriculum Context
• Curriculum Area: English
• Year Level: Year 8
• Achievement Standard Alignment: Refer directly to the Western Australian Curriculum achievement standards for the Curriculum Area and Year Level ensure consistency in descriptors and criteria.
• Senior School: If the Year Level is 11 or 12, then look to the SCSA syllabus document for the Curriculum Area for guidance. Example subjects include: English ATAR, Mathematics Applications ATAR, Physical Education Studies General, Visual Arts General.

3. Performance Scale

Use the following performance scale for each criterion:
• Excellent: At least 75% of total marks for the criterion
• High: At least 65%
• Satisfactory: At least 45%
• Limited: At least 30%
• Very Low: Above 0%
• No Evidence: 0

4. Descriptor Requirements
• Write no more than two sentences for each descriptor to maintain clarity and conciseness.
• Use the language of the Western Australian Curriculum for English to ensure consistency.
• Adapt provided language where needed, ensuring task-specific relevance. Example descriptors:
o Excellent: Demonstrates sustained control and highly effective use of narrative conventions to engage the audience. Ideas are insightful and innovative.
o High: Shows effective use of narrative conventions to engage the audience. Ideas are relevant and well-developed.
• In the Limited descriptor, include this statement: “May have had significant support or scaffolding.”

5. Criteria and Weighting

Create separate tables for each marking criterion with the following weightings:
• Understanding of Genre: 15 marks
• Language Features: 15 marks
• Written Expression: 10 marks
• Editing and Revision of Draft: 10 marks

6. Marks Allocation
• Assign a range of marks to each performance level within the scale.
• Ensure the ranges are clearly defined, with no overlap between levels. Example: Excellent: 10–12 marks; High: 8–9 marks; Satisfactory: 5–7 marks

7. Table Formatting
• Use separate tables for each criterion to ensure clarity and ease of use.
• Table structure:
 Criterion Name (as the table title)
 Descriptors for each performance level (Excellent, High, Satisfactory, Limited, Very Low, No Evidence)
 Marks Range
• Formatting requirements:
 Centre-align marks
 Left-align descriptors
 Bold section headers for clarity

8. Task-Specific Customisation
• Tailor the marking key to reflect unique elements of the task, such as specific genre conventions, focus areas, or scaffolding requirements.


9. Example Output

Each criterion should have its own table, formatted as follows:

Understanding of Genre

Descriptor Marks Range
Excellent: Demonstrates clear understanding of myth conventions, including structure and vivid imagery. 10–12
High: Uses myth conventions effectively but may lack originality or depth. 8–9
Satisfactory: Applies basic myth conventions with limited engagement or complexity. 5–7
Limited: Minimal use of myth conventions, with significant scaffolding. 3–4
Very Low: Attempts but lacks clarity or relevance. 1–2
No Evidence: No observable use of myth conventions. 0

Language Features

Descriptor Marks Range
Excellent: Uses language features consistently and effectively to enhance meaning and engage the audience. 10–12
High: Demonstrates control over language features to enhance meaning but with some inconsistencies. 8–9
Satisfactory: Basic use of language features, though they may lack variety or precision. 5–7
Limited: Minimal use of language features, often requiring significant scaffolding. 3–4
Very Low: Attempts to use language features, but with little impact or accuracy. 1–2
No Evidence: No observable use of language features. 0

Written Expression

Descriptor Marks Range
Excellent: Demonstrates sustained clarity, precision, and grammatical accuracy throughout. 9–10
High: Maintains control of grammar and expression, with occasional lapses in clarity. 7–8
Satisfactory: Basic grammatical accuracy, though errors may detract from meaning. 5–6
Limited: Significant errors in grammar and expression, impacting clarity. 3–4
Very Low: Frequent errors that obscure meaning. 1–2
No Evidence: No observable control of written expression. 0

10. Professional Output
• Deliver a professionally formatted marking key with separate tables for each criterion.