Discover why slicing a `numpy` array incorrectly gives unexpected shapes and learn how to solve this indexing issue for efficient data manipulation.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64420455/ asked by the user 'pfc' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5005808/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64420590/ provided by the user 'Ricardo Erikson' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2102916/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: why does numpy array return wrong shape of sub arrays when indexing
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the numpy Array Indexing: Fixing Incorrect Shapes in Sub-arrays
When working with numpy, a powerful library for numerical computing in Python, many users encounter perplexing issues around array indexing. One common problem arises when we try to extract sub-arrays from a numpy array. This guide will delve into a specific issue where a user faces unexpected output shapes when indexing.
The Problem: Unexpected Shapes from Array Indexing
Consider the following scenario:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
In this example, the user intends to extract a patch from an array by indexing it in two different ways. The first method, a[x1:x2][y1:y2], yields a shape of (16, 512), while the second method, a[x1:x2, y1:y2], produces a different — and expected — shape. This difference can be confusing and lead to misunderstandings.
Why Does This Happen?
Slicing Explained
When you slice the array using two methods:
Single Dimensional Slicing:
a[x1:x2]: This command extracts rows from the array. In this case, it results in a shape of (16, 512) representing 16 rows and 512 columns.
When you follow this with another slice operation, like p1[y1:y2], you are not slicing the original array a anymore; instead, you are slicing the result of the previous operation. Here, you only slice the rows again, which results in the same (16, 512) shape.
Multi-dimensional Slicing:
a[x1:x2, y1:y2]: This command specifies both rows and columns. By including both indices, you extract the intended sub-array, which would give you the correct shape based on your specified ranges.
Important Note on Slicing
It’s crucial to understand that in numpy, slicing like this effectively operates on the resulting array from the first slice operation. For a 2-dimensional array:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
This means you're only slicing by rows. The total number of columns remains intact (15 in this case). To correctly slice both rows and columns, one must always use the comma to separate the two dimensions:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Conclusion
Understanding how numpy handles indexing is crucial for efficient data manipulation and analysis. As illustrated, using the correct slicing method allows for precise control over the shape of sub-arrays extracted from a larger array. Always remember to use the multi-dimensional slicing technique (e.g., with a comma) when you want to manipulate both rows and columns simultaneously.
Whether you are processing image data, machine learning datasets, or other forms of numerical data, mastering array indexing will significantly improve your workflow.
By eliminating subtle indexing mistakes, we can harness the full power of numpy for our tasks!
Информация по комментариям в разработке