Скачать или смотреть Enhancing XSLT 1.0 Grouping for Accurate Soil Data Output

Discover advanced techniques to group soil data effectively using `XSLT 1.0`, overcoming common issues like ignored layers and optimizing depth outputs.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/72967431/ asked by the user 'lilaaffe' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/15226631/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72970892/ provided by the user 'John Ernst' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7333101/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: XSLT 1.0 grouping for text output

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Solving Soil Data Grouping Issues with XSLT 1.0

In the realm of data processing, especially with XML, the need to manipulate and present data in a structured way is often encountered. A particularly common challenge arises in the grouping of data. For soil data management, the ability to group layers based on depth and other attributes can create a clearer and more informative representation. This guide addresses an interesting scenario where we need to group soil data by the STRAT attribute, handling specific conditions along the way.

The Problem Statement

The XML dataset comprises LAYER elements, each with attributes such as DEPTHTO, PETRO, and STRAT. Our goal is to group these layers based on their STRAT value while also considering their depth. The initial XML input reflects data across varying depths, which complicates the output since we want to ignore certain entries, specifically those marked as EGART="Lost_Data".

Sample XML Structure

Here’s an example of the XML structure we’re working with:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The existing output generated by the XSLT was as follows:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

However, the required output format includes refining the depth values and ensuring that ignored layers are absent from the result.

The Solution

To achieve the desired output, we can utilize advanced features in XSLT 1.0. Below, we break down the necessary steps and provide an updated XSLT stylesheet that will help produce the correct results.

Step 1: Set Up the XSLT Template

First, we need to establish our main template and variables. The main components will be responsible for accumulating depth values and creating group identifiers based on the STRAT attribute.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 2: Key Definitions

We will define a key that allows us to group layers by their STRAT attribute efficiently:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Step 3: Filtering Layers

Next, we will filter out layers that are not relevant, specifically those with the EGART attribute set to "Lost_Data". This is essential to ensure that they do not affect our grouping.

Step 4: Generating the Zones

Utilizing recursion, we will generate the output for each zone by examining the layers left after filtering. This involves calculating both the starting and the ending depth values dynamically based on the layers in each group:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Final XSLT Example

Here’s a streamlined version of the complete XSLT that incorporates all the discussed elements:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Conclusion

This approach will effectively group the soil data as desired while bypassing irrelevant LAYER entries marked with "Lost_Data". By structuring the XSLT as shown and utilizing the provided methods, you can achieve a more accurate output that reflects the geological formations and their respective depths correctly.

Remember to test the XSLT with different datasets to ensure robustness, especially against varying data conditions that your application may encounter. Happy coding!