Legal dictation 110 wpm with punctuation, Allahabad High Court,

Legal dictation 110 wpm with punctuation, Allahabad High Court, #100 wpm legal Dictation
This video/content is only for educational purposes (shorthand dictation).

110 wpm legal Dictation
100 wpm legal Dictation
90 wpm legal Dictation
80 wpm legal Dictation
English Dictation
legal judgement
legal dictation
Allahabad High Court Matter
Allahabad High Court APS Post
shorthand outlines


Heard Sri Madan Srivastav, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Raaj Sahai assisted by Shri Parihar, learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance company Ltd. The owner and the driver have absented themselves though served.


This appeal, at the behest of the claimants has been preferred against the award and order dated 21.12.2011 passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bulandshahr in M.A.C.P. No. 207 of 2008 decided by Sri Vijay Kumar, HJS. I normally do not subscribe to theory of the writing name of presiding officer but the facts in which and the manner in which the tribunal deal with the issues before it has prompted me to write his name.


The factual scenario relates to an accident having taken place on 26th of February 2008 at about 9.00 pm when the deceased along with her husband and other person namely Hari Singh and others were travelling from village where they stayed to village Hissail in Maruti Van No.DL 1CD/2529 driven by her husband namely claimant No.1. When this maruti van reached G.T. Road near village Ranauli, a tanker coming from the opposite direction which was driven very negligently and carelessly in gig gag manner suddenly turned to its right side of the road and rammed into the maruti van caused the accident in which wife of Hari  Singh, wife of claimant No.1 and one another person namely child sustained multiple injuries. Wife of Hari Singh died in the Government Hospital at Khurja on the very same day. The wife of the present claimant No.1 suffered the pain for almost about three months and was hospitalised. She died out of these injuries only and there is no evidence on record.


F.I.R. of the incident was lodged on 26.2.2008 at 11.15 at the police station as Case Crime No. 40 of 2008 was registered against the driver of the tanker. The charge-sheet was laid against the driver of the tanker. The deceased was a household lady and along with it was engaged with animal husbandry and was earning Rs.3000/- per month. The opponent No.1 and 2 filed joint written statements denying the version of the claimants and brought on record that the vehicle was insured with  General Insurance Co. which was valid from 16.12.2008 to 15.12.2009.  General Insurance Co. denied the version of the claim petition. The Tribunal framed several issues and came to the conclusion that the husband of the deceased namely claimant No.1 who was driving the vehicle was equally negligent and written the finding of the contributory negligence thereby halving the compensation awarded to the claimants. No other facts are necessary as the accident has been admitted, the death occurring out of the injuries is admitted, the appellant being legal representative is not accepted. 479 words