Скачать или смотреть How to Stream a Mono List Object Through Spring Webflux

Discover how to effectively handle streaming a `Mono List Object ` in Spring Webflux, overcoming common pitfalls like AWS timeout errors.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/68956855/ asked by the user 'Sri Santhosh Natarajan' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/8498664/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/68957580/ provided by the user 'Panagiotis Bougioukos' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7237884/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: How to stream a Mono list Object through Spring webflux?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
How to Stream a Mono<List<Object>> Through Spring Webflux

Streaming responses in web applications can often be a complex task, particularly when using reactive programming frameworks like Spring Webflux. One common issue developers encounter is related to converting a Flux into a Mono<List<Object>>. This challenge can lead to AWS timeout errors due to improper handling of streamed data. In this guide, we’ll explore the problem and provide a detailed solution to effectively implement streaming in your Spring Webflux application.

Understanding the Problem

When working with Spring Webflux, it's essential to understand the differences between Mono and Flux:

Mono: Represents either one value or no value. This means it can serve a single response or none at all.

Flux: Represents a sequence of 0 to N values. It can yield multiple items over time and is typically the choice for streaming data.

The error arises from the nature of Mono, which is designed to return a single value. Stream responses using Mono may result in a timeout when the expectation is a larger response, such as a list of items from a Flux. In your case, the backend is returning a reactive stream of data, but it gets handled as a single element, leading to the loss of streaming benefits.

The Core of the Issue

When the service method getAllResult(id) returns a Flux<Result>, converting it directly to Mono<List<ResultDao>> means only a singular object or response is streamed. This can lead to AWS timing out due to the lack of continuous response from the server.

Since Mono is treated as a single response entity, the intention behind streaming multiple elements (as would be typical with a Flux) is lost.

Solution: Properly Streaming with Spring Webflux

To effectively handle your streaming response, you'll want to ensure that you can take the Flux of results and gather them into a List without prematurely concluding the data flow. Here's a practical approach to implement this:

1. Adjust Your Service Method

Instead of trying to directly return Mono<List<ResultDao>>, consider your method's response to accommodate a streaming approach.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

2. Explanation of the Changes

Response Type: By changing the return type to Flux<ResultDao>, we keep the streaming capability intact, allowing the response to send multiple objects over time rather than collapsing them into one list.

Mapping: The use of the mapping function converts each Result object into a ResultDao without prematurely collecting them into a list.

3. Advantages of This Approach

Non-blocking: Stream multiple elements without causing AWS to timeout since it can handle responses as they arrive.

Flexibility: Utilize the full power of reactive programming, allowing different parts of your application to respond appropriately as data streams in.

Conclusion

In conclusion, handling streaming of data with Mono<List<Object>> in Spring Webflux requires a thoughtful approach to ensure that your application remains responsive. By utilizing Flux for continuous data flow, you can avoid issues such as AWS timeouts and fully harness the capabilities of reactive programming.

Understanding how to properly structure your methods with Spring Webflux will lead to better performance, user experience, and efficient application behavior. Happy coding!