Скачать или смотреть Understanding Rust: Mixing Return and Expression in Methods

Explore why mixing return statements and expressions in Rust methods causes issues and how to properly return values.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62222941/ asked by the user 'Sjoerd222888' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/3737186/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62223311/ provided by the user 'Bobulous' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1515834/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why cannot I mix return and expression in methods

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Rust: Mixing Return and Expression in Methods

When working with Rust, developers often encounter peculiarities in how the language handles return types and values within methods. One common question that arises is: Why can’t I mix return statements with expressions in methods? This question can be confusing for new Rust programmers, especially when they see some examples that compile successfully while others fail.

In this guide, we'll break down this issue, illustrate it with examples, and provide a clearer understanding of Rust's expectations regarding return types for methods.

The Problem Explained

The Example Code

Let's examine four variants of a method can_hold defined for a Rectangle:

Example A: This example uses a return statement.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Example B: This example uses an if/else statement without return.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Example C: This example tries to combine an expression and a return statement.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Example D: This example also tries to combine expressions.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

What Compiles and What Doesn't

Examples A and B compile successfully.

Examples C and D fail to compile, returning an error message that states: expected (), found bool.

Why Do Some Examples Fail?

Understanding the Compiler Expectations

The key to understanding why some examples fail lies in how Rust interprets control flow and return types:

Example A works because the return statement guarantees that a bool value is returned, regardless of the control flow.

Example B compiles because Rust allows the last expression of the method to dictate the return value if there's no explicit return. Both branches of the if/else provide boolean values.

Example C fails because, even though true is reached when the condition is met, it is not the last line executed in the method. The return false statement after the if block means the compiler expects an () type (indicating no return value), leading to a mismatch.

Example D encounters the same issue as Example C. The expression true, while valid, is not the final line executed, causing the return type to default to ().

The Simplest Solution

You do not need to use if or else constructs to achieve your intent. The whole computation can be simplified into a single expression:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Why This Works

In this implementation, the expression evaluates directly to a boolean value (true or false), and since it's the only line in the method, it automatically serves as the return value.

Conclusion

Understanding how Rust handles methods with respect to return statements and expressions can clarify many common issues faced by developers. By recognizing that the last evaluated expression determines the return value, one can write cleaner, more efficient Rust code.

Ultimately, avoiding confusion over mixing return statements and expressions will lead to smoother programming experiences in Rust.

Feel free to reach out if you have more questions about Rust or if you’d like to dive deeper into any other concepts!