Explore the reasons behind the discrepancies in Kmeans outputs between Matlab and Python, even with the same initial centroids. Learn how to address clustering issues effectively.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64240499/ asked by the user 'piyush' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/14405969/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64246251/ provided by the user 'obchardon' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/4363864/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Kmeans with initial centroids give different outputs in Matlab and Python environment
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Kmeans Variance: Why Matlab and Python Produce Different Outputs
Clustering techniques are pivotal in data analysis, and among these techniques, the Kmeans algorithm stands out for its simplicity and effectiveness. However, users often face inconsistencies when implementing Kmeans in different programming environments, such as Matlab and Python. A common issue is the differing outputs produced by the same initial centroids. In this post, we will dissect the problem at hand and provide a thorough solution to ensure consistency across environments.
The Kmeans Challenge
Consider the following input dataset for projecting clusters using Kmeans:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
With this input, the goal is to partition the data into three clusters, starting from the same initial centroids. Let's take a look at how Kmeans is implemented in both environments.
Kmeans in Matlab
In Matlab, the Kmeans implementation looks like this:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
The output generated here is as follows:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Kmeans in Python
In Python, the implementation using the sklearn library is as follows:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
The output produced is:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
As seen, the centroids and the classification of data points into clusters differ remarkably between Matlab and Python.
The Reason Behind the Discrepancies
Understanding Distance Calculation
When executing Kmeans, the algorithm iteratively assigns points to the nearest centroid and recalculates these centroids. However, in certain circumstances, such as having an unreachable centroid (like 1.5 in this case), both Matlab and Python handle this scenario differently.
Matlab Approach: If no point is closer to a centroid during an iteration, Matlab recalibrates it based solely on the nearby points assigned to other centroids, creating room for different outcomes.
Python Approach: Meanwhile, Python tends to retain the centroid value unless a point is directly associated with it, which might lead to certain centroids being ignored altogether.
Iterative Centroid Adjustment
The following is a simplified version of the Kmeans algorithm in Matlab for better understanding:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
In this manipulation, you see that if a centroid remains unassociated with any point, recalculating its value can lead to complications. Particularly, if a centroid like 1.5 never is the closest, it can lead to confusion in cluster creation.
Best Practices to Avoid Discrepancies
To mitigate such issues when initializing centroids, consider the following strategies:
Ensure Initial Centroids Are Representative: Select initial centroids that are the closest to at least one data point in your dataset. Doing so can ensure that every centroid is relevant and minimizes isolation.
Utilize Distinct Values: You may also choose to take the first three distinct values from your dataset as initial centroids, guaranteeing coverage.
Run Multiple Trials: Given the nature of the algorithm, several trials with varied initializations can give a broader view of your clusters’ shapes and distribution.
Final Thoughts
The Kmeans algorithm is robust but can be sensitive to initial conditions. Understanding how different programming environments handle these conditions is paramount for achieving reliable clustering results. By applying a rationale behind the initialization of centroids, you can significantly enhance the performance and consistency of your clustering analyses.
Explore these suggestions and im
Информация по комментариям в разработке