Скачать или смотреть Understanding Why Your Generic Extension Method Requires dynamic Instead of Concrete Type in Dart

Explore the reasons behind Dart's handling of generic types in extension methods and learn how to properly define function parameters for better type safety.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64644727/ asked by the user 'IL_Agent' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2639219/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64645184/ provided by the user 'Alex Radzishevsky' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2033394/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why does my generic extension method require dynamic instead of concrete type?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Why Your Generic Extension Method Requires dynamic Instead of Concrete Type in Dart

Dart's powerful type system allows developers to create flexible and reusable functions through generics and extension methods. However, you may find yourself facing a perplexing situation: why does your generic extension method display a dynamic type instead of the intended concrete type? In this guide, we will break down the issue, explore the underlying reasons, and identify the correct approach for defining function parameters in a generic context.

The Problem Statement

Suppose you have defined an extension method on an Iterable of a generic type T. Your goal is to create a method that calculates the sum of a particular property of the objects in that iterable. Here's a simplified version of your initial attempt:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this extension, you declare a method called sum which takes a function parameter called extract. When testing this extension with a class named Data, you might find the data parameter in the provided lambda function has a type of dynamic instead of the explicit Data type you anticipated.

Here's the testing code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When you try to specify the type of data in the lambda as (Data data) => data.value, you encounter a compilation error, which states:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

What's Going Wrong?

Misinterpretation by the Analyzer

The crux of the issue lies in how the Dart analyzer interprets the declaration of the extract function parameter. When you state the parameter as:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The analyzer understands T as a parameter with a name that happens to be T and assumes it has a type of dynamic. Essentially, it is treating it as a method signature rather than truly recognizing T as a generic type parameter.

Correcting the Definition

To help the analyzer correctly interpret T as a type parameter, you should change the way you declare the extract function. Instead of the previous approach, consider using one of the following recommended patterns:

Use an explicit function type declaration for clarity:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Alternatively, a more concise but equally effective declaration can be:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The Finalized Solution

Here’s how your ListExtensions might look after applying the correct function parameter definitions:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

With these adjustments, the data parameter in your lambda function will correctly recognize its type as Data, avoiding the dynamic issue and enhancing type safety in your Dart applications.

Conclusion

Understanding how to properly declare function parameters in generics can help prevent unexpected behavior and ensure your code is type-safe. By adapting your approach to parameter definitions, you can take full advantage of Dart's type system and create cleaner, more reliable code. If you encounter similar situations in your Dart development journey, remember the distinction between type parameters and parameter names, as it can make all the difference in your code's behavior!