Скачать или смотреть 👉🏻big karnataka High today decision Victim Not Supporting ProsecutionCase,

👉🏻big karnataka High today decision Victim Not Supporting ProsecutionCase, #posco홀딩스목표가 #shorts #viral #trending #facts #karnataka #highcourt

Case name: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA v/s SRI. RAGHUVEER & Anr. and connected appeal


Victim Not Supporting Prosecution Case, Non-Corroboration Of Medical Evidence: Karnataka High Court Upholds Acquittal In POCSO Case


The Karnataka High Court upheld the acquittal of a man accused of raping a girl claimed to be a minor, holding that in cases where the victim does not support the prosecution and where medical evidence does not corroborate the allegations, such cases have a high chance of resulting in acquittal. In doing so the court noted that the victim had herself eloped with the accused. A division bench of Justice HP Sandesh and Justice Venkatesh Naik T said:

veLaw Hindi Top Stories Supreme Court High Court News Updates Articles Law Schools Law Firms Corporate Law Digests Law Firms Law Schools Corner More LiveLaw Hindi Top Stories Supreme Court High Court News Updates Articles Law Schools Corporate Law Digests Law Firms More Academy LiveLaw Biz Contact Us Advertise With Us Careers Who We Are Home/High Courts/Karnataka High Court/Victim Not Supporting Prosecution... Victim Not Supporting Prosecution Case, Non-Corroboration Of Medical Evidence:

Karnataka High Court Upholds Acquittal In POCSO Case LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK 18 Feb 2026 8:25 PM (5 mins read ) Share this Listen to this Article The Karnataka High Court upheld the acquittal of a man accused of raping a girl claimed to be a minor, holding that in cases where the victim does not support the prosecution and where medical evidence does not corroborate the allegations, such cases have a high chance of resulting in acquittal. In doing so the court noted that the victim had herself eloped with the accused.

A division bench of Justice HP Sandesh and Justice Venkatesh Naik T said: Also Read - 'No Public Interest, Should Not Engage Judicial Time': Karnataka High Court Rejects PIL Seeking Change Of Ward Name, Imposes ₹5K Cost "The main evidence before the Court is with regard to the evidence of the victim girl. The evidence of the victim girl, particularly when she was taken to the Magistrate after giving the statement before the police, she categorically says that she fell in love with him and they used to roam around the city every now and then. When the parents came to know about their love affair, she was sent to the house of P.W.1. On 16.10.2023, both of them eloped and then first went to Kamakshipalya, where they had sexual intercourse, even though she says she had resisted...Having considered this, it is very clear that both of them were loving each other and they used to roam around the city every now and then. The admission on the part of P.W.1 is clear that when she (victim) was sent to the house of P.W.1, she only gave the address of the house of P.W.1 to the accused and thereafter she eloped along with the accused...The Court has to take note of the conduct of the victim and she only called the accused and went along with him... In cases under the POCSO Act, where the victim does not support the prosecution and medical evidence does not corroborate the allegations, the case generally face a high probability of acquittal due to lack of evidence. In such cases, the Court looks for independent corroborative evidence, such as testimony from other circumstances viz., FLS report etc"

https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/karnatak...

https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/karnatak...