Скачать или смотреть Why India Banned Sci-Hub: The Fight Over Free Knowledge (தமிழ்)

The Academic Paywall and the Fight for Open Knowledge
A significant paradox exists in India: despite being the fourth-largest producer of PhD graduates globally, its academic community faces severe barriers to accessing essential scholarly research due to exorbitant costs imposed by a handful of global publishers.
5.1. The High Cost of Knowledge Access
• Economic Barrier: Doctoral students with limited stipends (₹20,000–₹35,000) and universities in under-resourced regions cannot afford to pay for individual articles, which can cost between $20 and $3,000.
• Publisher Dominance: The debate intensified after the Delhi High Court ordered the blocking of free-access platforms like Sci-Hub and LibGen, following a copyright infringement case by three major publishers who control 40% of the global market.
• Reliance on Free Platforms: A 2021 study revealed that India accounted for 8.7% of all Sci-Hub downloads in 2017, with over 13 million requests, indicating widespread reliance on such platforms for research.
5.2. Consequences of Knowledge Privatization
• Impact on Healthcare: The inability to access the latest research is particularly dire in healthcare, hindering the development of tailored treatments for local challenges in the Global South, such as tuberculosis and antimicrobial-resistant HIV.
• Distorted Research Priorities: Universities are seen to favor researchers publishing in high-profile, paywalled journals over those addressing urgent social needs. This system reinforces the privatization of knowledge, dominated by corporate interests and intellectual property rights.
• Perpetuating Inequity: The current model sidelines grassroots expertise from the Global South. Local researchers are often underrepresented in authorship, while research framing remains rooted in a Global North perspective.
5.3. The Movement Towards Open Science
• Global Framework: In 2021, 193 UNESCO member states, including India, adopted an international framework on open science to make knowledge transparent, accessible, and collaborative.
• The Core Argument: The central thesis is that knowledge must be treated as a global commons, not a commodity. Science is a collective exercise, and its findings should be accessible to all, including the communities that participate in the research.
• Call to Action: There is an imperative for governments and civil society to pressure publishing giants to dismantle paywalls, democratizing access to knowledge to empower societies to tackle global challenges like pandemics and climate change.