Скачать или смотреть Understanding the Difference in Long Integer Behavior Between Jupyter and PyCharm

Discover why the behavior of long integers differs in Jupyter and PyCharm, including syntax comparisons and code optimizations.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/72162304/ asked by the user 'Eason Wang' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/17299962/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/72162430/ provided by the user 'Artyer' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/5754656/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Difference of the long integer python object between jupyter and pycharm?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding the Difference in Long Integer Behavior Between Jupyter and PyCharm

When programming in Python, particularly when dealing with integers, a common source of confusion arises regarding how the same code can yield different results in different environments, such as Jupyter and PyCharm. A user recently encountered an issue with long integers that raised two important questions:

What is the difference between the two value assignment methods in object-level?

Why do the results differ between PyCharm and Jupyter when running the same code?

In this guide, we will explore these questions, clarify the underlying concepts, and provide insight into how Python handles integer assignments.

The Code Example

To illustrate the problem, consider the following code blocks:

First Code Block

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Second Code Block

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

The results of the first block were different based on the environment, which puzzled the programmer.

Object Reference in Python

Before diving into the differences observed, it’s essential to understand how Python handles integers. In Python, small integers (typically between -5 and 256) are cached and reused. This means that whenever you create a small integer variable, Python will re-use the existing object rather than create a new one. As for larger integers, Python does not guarantee this optimization, leading to different behaviors based on how they are assigned.

Why the Difference?

Behavior Explained

Single Line Assignment vs. Tuple Unpacking:

In the first code block (a = 1431324 followed by b = 1431324), each assignment is processed separately. As a result, Python creates two different objects for a and b, which leads to the output of False for a is b in Jupyter (and True in PyCharm possibly due to execution order or environmental caching).

Tuple Unpacking:

In the second code block, a, b = 1431324, 1431324, this is a tuple unpacking operation. Here, both values are treated as a single statement, and Python optimizes it by creating a single constant object for the integer value shared by both a and b. This is why a is b returns True in both environments.

Observation Through Bytecode:

The bytecode can demonstrate this optimization. For example, compiling both styles of assignment shows that the compilation for tuple unpacking merges constants, while separate assignments do not.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Running the disassembly on both code snippets reveals that the constants in the tuple are merged, while they are separate for individual assignments.

Conclusion

In summary, the confusion surrounding the differences in the behavior of long integers in Jupyter versus PyCharm comes down to how Python handles object references and constant optimization.

In environments like PyCharm, the behavior might be influenced by how multiple statements are processed or compiled.

In contrast, Jupyter's line-by-line execution may lead to distinct object creations for each line of code.

Understanding these nuances can aid in writing more efficient and effective Python code, and help prevent unexpected behavior when switching between different environments.

By grasping these concepts, you can enhance your programming practice and avoid common pitfalls associated with integer handling in Python.