Скачать или смотреть Improve Your Kotlin Code: Simplifying Validation with Shorter Logic

Discover how to streamline your `Kotlin` code and reduce cognitive complexity with simple validation methods in this engaging guide.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/65252563/ asked by the user 'wenus' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/7984963/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/65252849/ provided by the user 'dreijntjens' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/575468/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Kotlin, how can I make my code shorter in this spaghetti code?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Simplifying Validation in Kotlin: A Guide to Cleaner Code

When working with code, especially in Kotlin, it’s not uncommon to encounter sections that can feel like a tangled mess—often referred to as "spaghetti code." One common issue arises during user input validation, where repeated checks for empty or null fields can lead to deep nesting and increased complexity. If you’ve ever grappled with this problem, you’re not alone.

In this article, we will explore how to refactor a validation function, making your code shorter, more readable, and easier to maintain.

The Initial Problem: Excessive Nesting

Consider the following Kotlin function responsible for gathering user input for three key fields. The original function contains multiple nested if statements, which can complicate readability and understanding. Here is the existing implementation:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Identifying Complexity

In this code:

Nested if statements make the function difficult to read and understand.

The error message and recursive function calls are cluttered within each conditional branch.

The Solution: Streamlined Logic

The goal is to reduce cognitive complexity by avoiding unnecessary nesting. Here’s how you can refactor the function:

Step-by-Step Refactoring

Check for empty fields early: Validate each input immediately after receiving it. If a field is empty, output an error message and call the function again.

Simplify Conditional Logic: Use early exits to avoid deep nesting, making your code flatter and easier to follow.

Here’s the condensed version of your function:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of the Refactored Code

Increased Readability: Each validation is clear and straightforward, allowing future developers (or even you!) to understand the logic without extra effort.

Reduced Cognitive Load: With fewer nested conditional statements, it becomes less mentally demanding to follow the flow of the function.

Maintainability: Future changes to validation rules can easily be integrated due to organized code structure.

Conclusion

By simplifying your Kotlin code and reducing nesting, you can enhance the overall quality of your programming. Streamlined logic not only makes your code cleaner but also boosts its maintainability, allowing you to focus on more complex problems without getting lost in the details.

Happy coding!