Скачать или смотреть Are We Constitutional Slaves? J Sai Deepak on Ram Rajya, Article 25 & State Control of Hindu Temples

#JSaiDeepak #SanatanDharma #RamRajya #FreeHinduTemples #Hindutva #Constitution #Secularism #HinduRashtra

Video Credits : Poornaprajna Vidyapeetha Pratishthana ( 2025 )

💰 kindly consider supporting our YT Team - https://pages.razorpay.com/supportcle...
Your contributions help us Fund in Spreading the Word to More people ! 🙏

💬 Join Our Community :
✅ WhatsApp Channel Link -
https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaJ3...
✅ Telegram Community Link -
https://t.me/clearcuttalksdiscussion

00:00 - Is the Path to Ram Rajya Clear?
00:02:31 - Constitution as Barrier to Ram Rajya
00:04:13 - Constitution's Agnosticism on Rama's Divinity
00:06:03 - Laws Preventing Reclamation of Temples
00:08:01 - European Morality vs. India's Judiciary
00:09:34 - British Takeover of Temples
00:11:30 - Post-1947 Justification for Temple Control
00:12:41 - Referendum on Freeing Temples from State
00:14:51 - Purpose of HRCE Laws: State Oversight
00:16:42 - Article 25 and Hindu-Specific Caste Bias
00:19:09 - Ambedkar's Rejection of Hindu Faith
00:21:12 - Free Dharmic Temples from State
00:24:17 - Building Hindu Non-State Institutions
00:27:16 - Material Support to Dharmic Causes
00:30:48 - Respect & Back Dharma's Frontline Fighters
00:33:23 - Protecting Dharma in Bharat

J Sai Deepak argues that even if Bharat's society wills Ram Rajya, the Constitution may obstruct it, pitting itself against Bharatiya civilization, dharma, and Ram Rajya. It symbolically recognizes civilizational history but lacks practical application in administration, policy, education, or justice. It mandates equal respect and protection for all values, including anti-Rama and anti-dharma philosophies, rendering constitutional equality incompatible with Ram Rajya.

Example: Ayodhya case (January 26, 1950, to November 14, 2019) required proving Shri Rama's birthplace—evidence unnecessary in a pro-dharma constitution. The constitution remains agnostic on Rama's existence, divinity, and history. The Places of Worship Act prevents reclaiming other sites.

The constitution equates dharma with religion, without mandating Bharatiya language for interpretation. It created constitutional morality untied to collective morality (dharma in Bharat). Courts rule constitutional morality ≠ collective morality, blocking dharma as moral compass.

Contrast with Europe: In intellectual property (bodhic sampada), patents avoid violating societal morality defined by European civilization. Bharat's Supreme Court rejects civilizational basis for constitutional morality, preventing drawing from dharma—unlike the European model it copies.

The constitution retains 1800s British laws seizing temples (civilizational nerve centers). Post-1947 Bharat continues this under secularism, controlling only Hindu institutions—implying agreement with colonizers. True decolonization would free temples. Deepak: Ram Rajya impossible with state-controlled temples. Proposes Hindu referendum on government control.

Hindu-specific HRCE acts in 13-15 states; others use general Public Trusts Act for all religions. Why extra laws? HRCE permits permanent state executive officer in temples—"tenant without eviction or rent," revealing British design for perpetual control.

Article 25 targets jati-based discrimination only in Hindu temples, assuming corruption and casteism (jativad) exclusive to majority community.

The constitution is not pro-Rama: authors opposed faith in Rama, Krishna, Shiva, Brahma, Vishnu (Hindu trinity) and called for annihilating Sanatana Dharma to end discrimination. Judicial interpretations reinforce anti-majority biases without filtering origin prejudices.

For Ram Rajya: Free dharmic institutions from state control; limit state to temporary, equal intervention for corruption across faiths. Constitution restricts dharma's freedom more than others'. State alienates Hindu resources, denying economic freedom for faith propagation—Hindu property as "everybody's property." Strengthen non-state Hindu institutions for safety, security, dignity, freedom. Recreate existing Ram Rajya, not European utopia. Non-dharmic expansionism protected; dharmic survival questioned. Post-independence, Hindus remain constitutional slaves or dhimis.

[Disclaimer] ⭐
This video is reposted for educational and informational purposes. All credits belong to the original owner. We do not claim ownership. For removal or alternate crediting, please contact us immediately. Thank you for your cooperation!

j sai deepak constitution, j sai deepak, j sai deepak on ucc, j sai deepak latest, j sai deepak bharat, j sai deepak podcast, j sai deepak on secularism, j sai deepak jnu, j sai deepak ambedkar, j sai deepak talk, j sai deepak iyer, j sai deepak news, sai deepak j, j sai deepak nehru, who is j sai deepak, j sai deepak india, j sai deepak debate, j sai deepak speech, j sai deepak savage, j sai deepak lawyer, j sai deepak videos, j sai deepak new book, j sai deepak thug life, j sai deepak interview