Скачать или смотреть Understanding Why Java Doesn't Use VarHandle for Collections Like AtomicReferenceArray

Explore the reasons Java opts not to implement `VarHandle` for collection classes, and learn how atomic operations enhance concurrency and performance.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/70478207/ asked by the user 'al pal' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/13874918/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/70478353/ provided by the user 'Louis Wasserman' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/869736/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Why Java is not using VarHandle for collection classes the way it is using it for AtomicReferenceArray?

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
The Mystery Behind Java's VarHandle and Collection Classes

Java is a powerful programming language widely recognized for its ability to handle concurrent operations effectively. A significant aspect of Java's concurrency utilities is the VarHandle class, which allows for atomic operations on objects. For instance, the AtomicReferenceArray class benefits immensely from VarHandle, performing concurrent operations without locking the entire array structure. However, this raises an interesting question: Why doesn’t Java use VarHandle for other collection classes in the same way?

Understanding the Problem

Many developers expect that since VarHandle promotes efficient concurrent modifications, it should be applied to all types of collections in Java. Yet, classes in the java.util.Collections framework primarily use synchronized methods, which lock the whole collection. This leads to suboptimal performance in scenarios requiring multiple threads to access the collection concurrently. The question thus arises: Are there specific reasons behind this design choice?

The Role of VarHandle in Java

Before diving into the solution, let's briefly discuss the significance of VarHandle:

Atomic Operations: The VarHandle class allows operations on fields without the need for explicit locking, thereby improving performance in concurrent scenarios.

Use Case: AtomicReferenceArray leverages VarHandle to handle concurrent access efficiently, making it a preferable choice in high-performance applications.

Why Aren’t Other Collections Implementing VarHandle?

At first glance, it may seem beneficial to implement VarHandle across all collection types. However, several key points explain this decision:

1. Thread-Safety Limitations

Using VarHandle does not make all collection types inherently thread-safe. While VarHandle enables atomic operations on individual elements, it does not address issues that may arise with arbitrary collection implementations. The synchronized factory methods in the Collections class are designed to ensure thread safety by allowing only one thread to modify the collection at a time, making them a reliable choice for general use.

2. Design Considerations for Collections

Synchronized vs. Non-Synchronized: The standard collections were designed with simplicity and ease of understanding in mind. For many scenarios, synchronized collections are sufficient, and the overhead introduced by optimizing them with VarHandle may not be warranted.

Performance Trade-offs: Implementing VarHandle would require significant changes in the existing framework and may lead to performance trade-offs in various contexts.

3. Potential for Concurrent Collections

While the traditional collections are tightly coupled with synchronized methods, there are collections explicitly built for concurrency, such as ConcurrentHashMap. There’s potential for optimizing these collections using VarHandle, but this would require dedicated effort:

Feature Requests: If you believe that a more widespread use of VarHandle could benefit specific collections, consider filing a feature request. Many enhancements in the language come from community suggestions and contributions.

Conclusion

Understanding Java’s decision not to employ VarHandle across all collection classes highlights the complexities of concurrency management in programming. While VarHandle presents opportunities for performance optimizations, not every collection scenario may require or benefit from its implementation. Developers should choose their collections based on use case requirements and be aware that while VarHandle enhances some structures, the traditional synchronized method appr