Скачать или смотреть Understanding Grammar for Recursive Descent Parsing

Is your grammar suitable for `recursive descent parsing`? Learn about left recursion, left factoring, and how to identify `LL(1)` grammars for effective parsing.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/64702827/ asked by the user 'Ray' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/12452706/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/64703854/ provided by the user 'rici' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1566221/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Grammar for recursive descent parsing

Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Grammar for Recursive Descent Parsing

When it comes to implementing parsers, especially recursive descent parsers, the grammar you choose plays a crucial role in determining whether or not parsing will be successful. A common question arises for developers and academics alike: Is there an easy way to tell whether a simple grammar is suitable for recursive descent parsing? Is eliminating left recursion and left factoring the grammar enough to achieve this? Let's delve into this important topic and break down the answer.

The Challenge: Predict Conflicts

To effectively create a recursive descent parser (without backtracking), you must ensure that there are no predict conflicts in your grammar. This is where the concept of LL(1) grammars comes into play. An LL(1) grammar is one that allows you to look ahead just one token to make parsing decisions, effectively avoiding predict conflicts.

What Are Predict Conflicts?

A predict conflict occurs when the parser cannot determine which rule to apply based on the next token. For instance, consider the following simplistic grammar example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Here’s the problem: if the parser is expecting an item and encounters an ID, it can't decide whether to use expr1 or expr2, hence the predict conflict. This conflict needs to be resolved to ensure smooth parsing operations.

Addressing the Problem: Elimination Techniques

Left Recursion and Left Factoring

While the elimination of left recursion and left factoring are common starting points when preparing a grammar for recursive descent parsing, they may not be enough. The goal is to ensure predict conflicts are resolved, but this might involve more than simply left factoring or eliminating recursion.

Left Recursion: Recursion expressed in a left manner can lead to infinite loops in your parser.

Left Factoring: This technique allows you to refactor the grammar so the parser can make more informed decisions with fewer ambiguities.

The Limitations

It is crucial to understand that there is no universal algorithm that can transform any arbitrary grammar into an LL(1) grammar. However, one can easily determine if a grammar fits into the LL(1) category by using specific tests.

Practical Considerations: Alternatives to Recursion

Interestingly, for practical purposes, you don't always need to eliminate left recursion in a recursive descent parser completely. Many times, you can convert recursion to iteration using while loops. Here’s how you would revise the previous rule with repetition operators:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This can be translated to a parsing function that looks like this:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this setup, you effectively eliminate the need for recursive calls by using a loop, simplifying the implementation.

Conclusion: The Art of Grammar Selection

In summary, while eliminating left recursion and left factoring are important steps, they might not be sufficient for creating a suitable grammar for recursive descent parsing. Recognizing predict conflicts and striving for an LL(1) structure is essential but often involves a mix of strategies as well as some level of experimentation.

In the world of parsing, grammar selection is as much an art as it is a science. Understanding these concepts can guide developers and linguists in choosing and implementing effective grammars, pushing the boundaries of what is possible with recursive descent parsing.