A guide to troubleshooting the differences between running code in `loop()` and custom functions in Arduino, including a detailed breakdown of common issues and solutions.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/62581974/ asked by the user 'Davide' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/1630538/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62595840/ provided by the user 'datafiddler' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/2819922/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Arduino: issue running the same code in loop() and in custom function
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Resolving the Arduino Loop Function Confusion: Understanding Custom Functions vs. loop()
When working with Arduino, you may find yourself encountering confusing behaviors while trying to run similar pieces of code both inside the loop() function and within a custom function. In this guide, we'll explore a common issue and provide a straightforward solution to help you differentiate between executing code in loop() and a custom function.
The Problem: Unexpected Behavior in Function Calls
Our exploration begins with a code snippet designed to iterate over a string and return the corresponding index of each character from a defined character array. The problem arises when the same block of code is executed in different contexts—once in the loop() and once in a custom function named myfunction().
What’s Going Wrong?
When running the code in the loop(), the expected output correctly displays the indices and respective characters from the array. However, when the same code runs inside the custom function, it returns incorrect indices (-1 for each character). The output of each approach can be summarized as follows:
In loop():
Correct indices shown for each character (a, b, c)
In myfunction():
Returned indices are -1, indicating that characters are not being found in the character array.
This discrepancy indicates a deeper issue with how variables are being handled in different scopes.
Diagnosing the Issue: The getIndexOf Function
Given that the getIndexOf function is central to retrieving indices in both scenarios, we must investigate how it behaves when executed in the custom function:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Here, the function checks against a dictionary to find the index of a character. The problem arises from how the character pointer c is passed. In your loop, you're passing a reference to a character pointer which is not behaving as intended across function calls.
The Solution: Using Character Arrays and Custom Functions
To resolve this issue clearly and effectively, we can refactor the code and improve our logic. Here's a breakdown of the updated approach:
Step 1: Simplifying the Character Array
Instead of using a pointer array of characters, let's use a string that allows easier indexing:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Step 2: Refactoring the getIndexOf Function
Update the function to ensure it properly finds indices based on character comparisons:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Step 3: Adjusting the Setup Function
Lastly, ensure the main setup function properly calls the magic throughout both the loop() and myfunction() without variable scoping issues:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Now, when you run this program, it will execute uniformly in both the custom function and the loop(), providing consistent results.
Final Thoughts
Debugging issues with functions in Arduino can be tricky at times, especially when variables don't behave the way we expect them to across different contexts. However, by simplifying our approach and making sure we understand how functions and variable scope interact, we can easily tackle these challenges. Armed with this knowledge, you can pursue your projects with greater confidence in your code's behavior!
Feel free to experiment with the above code snippet, and reach out if you encounter further issues or questions. Happy coding with Arduino!
Информация по комментариям в разработке