Duniya ke sab se powerful mulk ka president ab keh raha hai ke duniya ko ek nayi international organisation chahiye—United Nations ke baad. Irony yeh hai ke jis UN ko World War ke baad global peace ke liye banaya gaya tha, use hi bypass karne ka plan aaj Washington se aa raha hai. Aur is plan ka naam hai Board of Peace.
Idea surface par simple lagta hai. Yeh kaha ja raha hai ke UN slow hai, ineffective hai, is liye ek “more nimble, more effective” international body chahiye. Lekin jab details samne aati hain, toh kahani simple nahi rehti. Is Board of Peace ke chair khud Donald Trump honge. Reportedly, kareeban 60 mulkon ko is board ka hissa banne ke liye invite kiya ja chuka hai. Permanent seat ke liye price tag rakha gaya hai—1 billion dollars. Peace, lekin paisay ke saath.
Sab se zyada interesting baat yeh hai ke is board ka origin Gaza se jora gaya tha, lekin jo charter circulate ho raha hai, us mein Gaza ka naam tak maujood nahi. Pichlay saal UN Security Council ne post-war Gaza ke liye ek administrative transition ka framework approve kiya tha. Trump ne is se aage ja kar apna 20-point peace plan announce kiya aur us ke under ek 11-member Gaza Executive Board bhi bana di.
Lekin jo charter potential member states ko bheja gaya, woh Board of Peace ko UN jaisi ek global conflict-resolution body ke taur par present karta hai. Yahin par sawal paida hota hai: is board ka mandate kaun de raha hai? Charter ke mutabiq, board ka chair—yaani Trump—ko extraordinary powers di ja rahi hain. Woh member states ko appoint aur remove kar sakta hai. Woh subsidiary bodies create, modify ya dissolve kar sakta hai. Aur in faislon ko reverse karne ke liye do-teesri majority chahiye. Yeh multilateral governance kam aur centralised authority zyada lagti hai.
Trump ka record United Nations ke saath kabhi smooth nahi raha. Us ke daur-e-presidency mein America ne kai UN agencies se withdrawal ki. Board of Peace ka idea bhi isi trajectory ka hissa lagta hai—UN ko undermine karna aur apni parallel structure khari karna. Charter ke alfaaz bohat khoobsurat hain: “stability promote karna”, “lawful governance restore karna”, aur “enduring peace secure karna”. Lekin yahin par ek aur irony khadi ho jaati hai.
Critics yaad dilate hain ke isi administration par international law ko ignore karne ke serious allegations lag chuke hain. Trump ne khud kaha tha ke international law nahi, balkay us ki “own morality” us ke decisions ko guide karti hai. Isi period mein America ne Iran par military strikes kiye, South American countries ke khilaaf force use karne ki dhamki di, aur Israel ko Gaza ki war mein full political aur military support diya—jis war mein tens of thousands Palestinians mare gaye aur poora enclave tabah ho gaya. Isi administration ka daawa hai ke woh rules-based world order uphold kar rahi hai.
Concern yahin se paida hota hai. Jab ek leader rivals aur allies ke darmiyan farq karna chhor de, toh global stability sab se zyada vulnerable ho jaati hai. Board of Peace aur us ke under banne wala Gaza Executive Board—dono mein Palestinian representation maujood nahi. Executive board mein zyada tar American officials shamil hain, jin mein Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump ke son-in-law Jared Kushner, aur Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff shamil hain. Media reports ke mutabiq, Qatar aur Egypt ke officials ke saath ek Israeli businessman bhi board ka hissa hai.
Is ke ilawa ek aur controversial naam bhi samne aata hai—Tony Blair—jin par Iraq war ke hawalay se war-crime allegations lagte rahe hain. Peace ke board mein war legacy ke saath aane walay log ek aur contradiction ko janam dete hain.
Is plan ka ek aur critical hissa International Stabilisation Force hai, jo security operations, demilitarisation, aur humanitarian aid delivery ke liye banai ja rahi hai. Pakistan aur kuch aur Muslim countries ko is force mein shamil honay ke liye approach kiya gaya hai. Yeh force ek American military officer ke under kaam karegi. Analysts warn kar rahe hain ke is force ka mandate ambiguous hai, aur yeh risk maujood hai ke ground par yeh Palestinian resistance ke khilaaf deploy ho sakti hai. Isi liye experts kehte hain ke countries ko sirf invitation nahi balkay implications bhi dekhni chahiyein.
Toh Board of Peace asal mein kya hai—global peace ka naya model, ya American hegemony ka updated version? Sawal yeh nahi ke United Nations perfect hai ya nahi. Sawal yeh hai ke jab ek superpower apni parallel world order banana shuru kar de, toh collective global system ka kya bachta hai? Aur jab peace ka idea power, price, aur personality ke gird ghoomne lage, toh duniya ko peace milti hai—ya sirf ek aur conflict ka structure?
Is sawal ka jawab abhi likha ja raha hai.
Информация по комментариям в разработке