Скачать или смотреть Let's Discuss: Ames v. Ohio and Texas Taking the Lead on AI Regulation feat. Bryan Driscoll | 232

Go to https://cozyearth.com and use code HUMANHR for 40% off their best-selling sheets, pajamas, towels, and more. And if you get a post-purchase survey? Let them know you heard about Cozy Earth right here.

In this episode of the Bringing the Human Back to Human Resources podcast, Traci Chernoff and Bryan Driscoll discuss recent legal developments affecting HR and employment law. They delve into the Ames v. Ohio case, which addresses reverse discrimination, and the implications for HR practices. The conversation then shifts to the Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin case regarding tax exemptions for religious organizations. Finally, they explore Texas's new AI regulation, its potential impact on employers, and the broader implications for workplace fairness and technology use in hiring processes.

Chapters
00:00 Introduction to Recent Legal Developments
01:18 Ames v. Ohio: Understanding Reverse Discrimination
16:02 Catholic Charities v. Wisconsin: Tax Exemption Insights
28:22 Texas AI Regulation: A New Frontier
39:47 Conclusion and Future Implications

Don't forget to rate, review, and subscribe! Plus, leave a comment if you're catching this episode on Spotify or YouTube.

We hope you enjoyed this month’s Policy Pulse episode. If you found our discussion insightful, we'd like you to take a moment to rate our podcast. Your feedback helps us grow and reach more listeners who are passionate about these topics. You can also leave a review and tell us what you loved or what you'd like to hear more of - we're all ears!

Connect with Traci here: ⁠https://linktr.ee/HRTraci⁠

Connect with Bryan:
Website: https://bryanjdriscoll.com/
LinkedIn:   / bryanjohndriscoll  

Disclaimer: Thoughts, opinions, and statements made on this podcast are not a reflection of the thoughts, opinions, and statements of the Company by whom Traci Chernoff is actively employed.

Please note that this episode may contain paid endorsements and advertisements for products or services. Individuals on the show may have a direct or indirect financial interest in products or services referred to in this episode.