Discover how to enhance `Pentaho` performance when working with `PostgreSQL` tables. Learn about the differences between table input and database lookup methods for optimal results.
---
This video is based on the question https://stackoverflow.com/q/61822952/ asked by the user 'Sarath Chandra' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9825866/ ) and on the answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/62426276/ provided by the user 'Sarath Chandra' ( https://stackoverflow.com/u/9825866/ ) at 'Stack Overflow' website. Thanks to these great users and Stackexchange community for their contributions.
Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Pentaho table input giving very less performance on postgres tables even for two columns in a table
Also, Content (except music) licensed under CC BY-SA https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/l...
The original Question post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license, and the original Answer post is licensed under the 'CC BY-SA 4.0' ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/... ) license.
If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Improving Pentaho Performance with PostgreSQL: Tips for Faster Data Throughput
When working with large datasets in Pentaho, performance can sometimes be an issue, especially when retrieving data from a database like PostgreSQL. A common question from users is: Why is my Pentaho table input taking so long to read data from PostgreSQL, even when querying only a couple of columns? In this blog, we will explore the challenges around data throughput in Pentaho and provide solutions to enhance performance.
Understanding the Problem
In this particular case, a user experiences poor performance while attempting to read from a PostgreSQL table using Pentaho. Despite querying only three columns from a table that contains 20 columns and approximately 4.8 million rows, the system processes an average of only 7,632 lines per second. This is significantly below the desired 15,000 rows per second throughput. Below is a summary of the problem:
Database: PostgreSQL
Table: individuals with 20 columns and ~4.8 million rows
Pentaho Version: 7.1
Input Query:
[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]
Performance Log:
Table input processed 4,869,591 lines at 7,632 lines/s
Stream lookup processed 9,754,378 lines at 15,288 lines/s
Given these statistics, it's clear that there is room for improvement. So, how can we increase this data retrieval performance?
Solutions for Enhancing Performance
1. Differentiate Between Input Methods
One crucial piece of advice derived from user experience is recognizing the difference in performance between Table Input and Database Lookup in Pentaho. Here’s a breakdown:
Table Input: This method results in slower data processing due to the way it handles data streams. It reads each row one by one from the database which can impede throughput.
Database Lookup: In contrast, this method directly retrieves the relevant data from the database, significantly improving performance for data retrieval tasks.
2. Optimize Queries
While the initial query to fetch data looks simple, there are ways to enhance it further:
Limit Columns: Always limit the number of columns in queries to only those necessary. This reduces the amount of data transferred and processed.
Introduce Filtering: If possible, add WHERE clauses to minimize the rows being fetched—this will drastically reduce the data size and time taken.
3. Review Server Configuration
When deploying Pentaho on a server like Oracle Linux, ensuring adequate resources is vital:
RAM: Ensure there is enough RAM available. The current server has 65,707 MB of RAM which is robust, but it's beneficial to monitor usage closely.
SQL Connection Settings: Adjust JDBC settings on your PostgreSQL connection to achieve better connectivity and throughput.
4. Use Efficient Steps in Data Integration
Not all steps in Pentaho provide the same performance. Be strategic about what steps you select for your ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) processes:
Test Different Approaches: Users have reported that switching from Table Input to Database Lookup has induced better performance metrics under similar load conditions.
Use Dummy Steps for Testing: Before deploying significant changes, employ dummy steps to simulate different configurations and measure their impact on performance.
Conclusion
When experiencing sluggish performance with Pentaho and PostgreSQL, consider changing your data input method from Table Input to Database Lookup. This change, along with optimized queries and suitable server configurations, can significantly enhance your data processing throughput. Remember, fine-tuning not only affects how fast you can read the data
Информация по комментариям в разработке