Do numbers really exist — or are they simply patterns in our minds?
Mathematical realism claims that numbers and mathematical entities exist independently of us, forming an abstract realm of truth. But In-Out Ontology (IOO) challenges this view.
In this episode, we explore how IOO redefines the nature of mathematical being. Numbers are not static entities in a Platonic heaven, but dynamic emergent relations arising from In-Out Indistincts (IOIs). Each number, ratio, and symmetry reflects a stabilized relational state within the flow of in-out entanglement.
This changes everything: mathematics is no longer a discovery of pre-existing objects but an unfolding of ontological directionality—the very process through which existence differentiates and stabilizes itself.
You’ll see how IOO bridges the gap between mathematical realism, structuralism, and phenomenological ontology, offering a new vision of what numbers are and how they emerge.
Summary Thought:
Numbers are not timeless shadows; they are the rhythmic crystallizations of relational being. In-Out Ontology transforms mathematics from a detached abstraction into an ontological event — a manifestation of the world’s self-articulating structure.
#In-Out Ontology, IOO, In-Out Indistinct, IOIs, mathematical realism, philosophy of mathematics, numbers, Platonism, nominalism, structural realism, ontology of numbers, metaphysics of mathematics, emergent structure, In-Out duality, cosmic emergence, relational ontology, mathematical ontology, philosophy of science, metaphysics, consciousness and mathematics, mathematical existence, IOE, In-Out Entanglement, ontological mathematics, phenomenology, Platonic realism, ontology of structure, philosophy, theoretical physics, cosmology, mathematical being, existence of numbers
Информация по комментариям в разработке